Uberall vs Whitespark
Zero of fourteen models named Uberall first on the direct prompt; zero named Whitespark. Uberall was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Whitespark by eight and Uberall carries 48 labels and Whitespark 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Berlin, Germany, founded 2013. Named in four categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the local listings management page.
By framing
UberallFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWhitespark
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Uberall and Whitespark were named in the same answer twenty-three times, of the 165 answers naming Uberall and the 40 naming Whitespark. In those answers Whitespark took the first choice two times and Uberall one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Uberall Whitespark first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Uberall on the left and Whitespark on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Whitespark4%#4 of 12Uberall2%#7 of 12Uberall2%#6 of 10Whitespark2%#8 of 10Uberall14%#3 of 10Whitespark0%#– of 10What the models said about Uberall
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Requires a 25-location minimum, eliminates it for most small businesses.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Yext or Uberall.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Yext, Uberall, and Birdeye at this stage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Yext and Uberall both position their products for multi-location brands, with bulk updates, publisher networks, duplicate suppression, and enterprise workflows.” GPT-5.4 mini · scale prompt · first choice
“Uberall — Better-rated for enterprise, real-time API sync (though pricey for small businesses).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Safer starting points: Look at Uberall (strong challenger with lower negatives)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Whitespark
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For the absolute lowest cost, Whitespark and BrightLocal are your best bets.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“many reviewers cite switching to Whitespark or BrightLocal "for more affordable pricing and simpler contracts."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · alternative
“Highly regarded for accuracy and Google integration. Often tops "most complete listings" lists; good value.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.