Index › GTM › Marketing › Influencer › Shopify Collabs vs Modash
Influencer platforms · November 2026 Edition

Shopify Collabs vs Modash

Zero of fourteen models named Shopify Collabs first on the direct prompt; zero named Modash. Shopify Collabs was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Modash by twelve and Shopify Collabs carries 18 labels and Modash 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Shopify Collabs

accepted challenger

By Shopify, Ottawa, Canada, founded 2006. Named in two categories this edition.

Modash

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share12%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1825A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Shopify Collabs reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Favikon was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Favikon vs Shopify Collabs · Favikon vs Modash · Shopify Collabs vs Upfluence

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the influencer platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Shopify CollabsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsModash
Direct00
Paraphrase01
Comparative00
Budget-constrained711 against Modash
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Shopify Collabs and Modash were named in the same answer twenty-two times, of the 74 answers naming Shopify Collabs and the 66 naming Modash. In those answers Modash took the first choice three times and Shopify Collabs seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Shopify Collabs and Modash stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Shopify Collabs Modash first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Shopify Collabs on the left and Modash on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Shopify Collabs and Modash stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20Favikon alternatives: Brandwatch Influence, KALO IQ, Modash, Sprout Social Influencer Marketing, Upfluence
DeepSeek V4 FlashFavikon alternatives: KALO IQ, Modash
Qwen 3.7 FlashFavikon alternatives: Influencity, Modash, Traackr

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Favikon alternatives: Archive, GRIN, Limelight
GPT-5.4 miniSprout Social Influencer Marketing alternatives: HypeAuditor, impact.com
Gemini 3.5 FlashFavikon alternatives: Onalytica, Passionfroot, SparkToro, Sprout Social
Perplexity SonarFavikon alternatives: impact.com
Mistral SmallKALO IQ, Upfluence alternatives: IQFluence
Llama 4 MaverickKALO IQ alternatives: Favikon, Traackr, Upfluence
Kimi K2Favikon, Later Influence alternatives: KALO IQ, Upfluence
GLM 4.7 FlashXFavikon alternatives: Traackr, Upfluence
MiniMax M2.5Favikon alternatives: KALO IQ, Upfluence
GPT-6 LunaFavikon alternatives: LinkedIn Creator Marketplace, Thinkers360
Muse Glimmer 30BFavikon, KALO IQ alternatives: Aspire, GoByline, Upfluence

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Shopify Collabs leads by four points.
Shopify Collabs9%#3 of 15
Modash6%#4 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Shopify Collabs leads by nine points.
Shopify Collabs12%#2 of 15
Modash4%#7 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Modash leads at enterprise.
Modash2%#10 of 13
Shopify Collabs0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Shopify Collabs

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“the best starting point is Shopify Collabs (if you're on Shopify) or Ainfluencer” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“If you're a Shopify merchant, Shopify Collabs is likely the best fit.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Modash

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Mid-market pricing → Influencity, Modash, Favikon (generally $150–$500/mo)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Modash is the strongest, most sensible default choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“best overall pick is usually Modash” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose tools (like HypeAuditor, Modash, or Phyllo-integrated tools) that analyze audience demographics and fake-follower percentages.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.