GRIN vs Modash
Zero of fourteen models named GRIN first on the direct prompt; zero named Modash. GRIN was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Modash by twelve and GRIN carries 37 labels and Modash 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the influencer platforms page.
By framing
GRINFirst choices, of fourteen modelsModash
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, GRIN and Modash were named in the same answer forty-two times, of the 111 answers naming GRIN and the 66 naming Modash. In those answers Modash took the first choice five times and GRIN two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
GRIN Modash first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GRIN on the left and Modash on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
GRIN2%#4 of 13Modash2%#10 of 13What the models said about GRIN
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid DTC-focused platforms: Platforms like GRIN, Aspire, or CreatorIQ are built for consumer e-commerce” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Lower pricing tiers than enterprise tools like Upfluence ($478+/month) or Grin (tiered subscriptions often $500+)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise platforms like Aspire, Upfluence, or Grin can easily cost $300–$1,000+ per month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Best For: High-volume brands needing an internal "Creator CRM." ... It excels at scaling campaigns but has a steeper learning curve.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Arguably the strongest Shopify integration — it connects product seeding, order tracking, and creator payments into one workflow.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose GRIN for a growing DTC brand managing an ongoing creator program.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Modash
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Mid-market pricing → Influencity, Modash, Favikon (generally $150–$500/mo)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Modash is the strongest, most sensible default choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“best overall pick is usually Modash” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose tools (like HypeAuditor, Modash, or Phyllo-integrated tools) that analyze audience demographics and fake-follower percentages.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.