Index › GTM › Marketing › Direct mail & gifting › Goody vs Postalytics
Direct mail and gifting platforms · November 2026 Edition

Goody vs Postalytics

Zero of fourteen models named Goody first on the direct prompt; zero named Postalytics. Goody was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Postalytics by nine and Goody carries 39 labels and Postalytics 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Goody

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Postalytics

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share19%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3914A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Goody reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Reachdesk was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Sendoso vs Goody · Sendoso vs Postalytics · Goody vs Reachdesk

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the direct mail and gifting platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GoodyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPostalytics
Direct001 against Goody
Paraphrase40
Comparative00
Budget-constrained71
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Goody · 1 against Postalytics
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Goody and Postalytics were named in the same answer nineteen times, of the 103 answers naming Goody and the 168 naming Postalytics. In those answers Postalytics took the first choice one time and Goody seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Goody and Postalytics stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Goody Postalytics first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Goody on the left and Postalytics on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Goody and Postalytics stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashReachdesk alternatives: Goody, Postal, Sendoso, Snappy
DeepSeek V4 FlashSendoso alternatives: Alyce, Goody, Postal, Reachdesk
Qwen 3.7 FlashSendoso alternatives: Postalytics, Reachdesk
Kimi K2Reachdesk alternatives: Goody
GPT-6 LunaSendoso alternatives: Goody, Reachdesk

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Sendoso alternatives: Postal, Reachdesk
GPT-5.4 miniSendoso alternatives: CorporateGift.com, Reachdesk
Perplexity SonarSendoso alternatives: Postal, Reachdesk
Grok 4.20Sendoso alternatives: PFL, Postal, Reachdesk
Mistral SmallReachdesk, Sendoso alternatives: Postal
Llama 4 MaverickSendoso alternatives: Postal, Reachdesk
GLM 4.7 FlashXSendoso alternatives: Postal, Reachdesk
MiniMax M2.5Reachdesk alternatives: Alyce, Postal, Sendoso
Muse Glimmer 30BReachdesk, Sendoso alternatives: Postal

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Goody leads by twenty-nine points.
Goody31%#1 of 11
Postalytics2%#7 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Goody leads by eighteen points.
Goody19%#2 of 12
Postalytics2%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Goody0%#9 of 9
Postalytics0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Goody

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Be cautious for cold outbound campaigns because their address collection is described as primarily email-based” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“pay-per-gift models such as Goody for small business use ... those scale differently for full ABM programs” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · soft negative
“B2C/Consumer-First Gifting Platforms (e.g., Goody, Snappy, Thnks) ... Lack of Deep CRM Automation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Goody is widely considered the best entry-level platform because it requires no minimums, no setup fees, and no recurring subscription costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Goody (free) for gifting + Lob (free developer plan) for direct mail” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, Goody is the best overall starting point.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Postalytics

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Postalytics (Use with Caution)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.