Rockerbox vs HockeyStack
Gane, the publisher, sells software in this category. Every product here is measured by the same method as in every other category. How the conflict is handled.
Four of fourteen models named Rockerbox first on the direct prompt; one named HockeyStack. Rockerbox was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and HockeyStack by eleven and Rockerbox carries 28 labels and HockeyStack 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the attribution and marketing mix modeling page.
By framing
RockerboxFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHockeyStack
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Rockerbox and HockeyStack were named in the same answer thirty-five times, of the 93 answers naming Rockerbox and the 101 naming HockeyStack. In those answers HockeyStack took the first choice four times and Rockerbox twelve.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Rockerbox HockeyStack first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Rockerbox on the left and HockeyStack on the right.The direct prompt
Rockerbox first, HockeyStack not the choice
4 of 14 modelsHockeyStack was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.HockeyStack first, Rockerbox an alternative
1 of 14 modelsRockerbox was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Rockerbox2%#13 of 19HockeyStack2%#10 of 19Rockerbox12%#2 of 22HockeyStack2%#8 of 22Rockerbox17%#2 of 16HockeyStack7%#5 of 16What the models said about Rockerbox
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“platforms (like Northbeam or Rockerbox) typically cost thousands of dollars monthly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“If e-commerce/omnichannel: Look for unified MMM+MTA with strong privacy resilience (Rockerbox, SegmentStream, Northbeam)” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“The best marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform for a mid-market B2B company is Rockerbox” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“For a balance, consider Rockerbox (attribution + incrementality) combined with Robyn (MMM).” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about HockeyStack
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Prioritize account-level attribution with Salesforce/HubSpot native integration (Dreamdata, HockeyStack, or Adobe Marketo Measure)” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.