Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Session replay › Dealfront vs PostHog
Session replay and heatmaps · November 2026 Edition

Dealfront vs PostHog

Zero of fourteen models named Dealfront first on the direct prompt; two named PostHog. Dealfront was named by ten of the fourteen models and PostHog by fourteen and Dealfront carries 10 labels and PostHog 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Dealfront

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

PostHog

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share12%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1037A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Dealfront reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Clarity was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Clarity vs Dealfront · Microsoft Clarity vs PostHog · Hotjar vs Dealfront

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the session replay and heatmaps page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DealfrontFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPostHog
Direct02
Paraphrase61
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative01
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Dealfront and PostHog stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Dealfront PostHog first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Dealfront on the left and PostHog on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Dealfront and PostHog stood in it.

PostHog first, Dealfront not the choice

2 of 14 modelsDealfront was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashPostHog alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Kimi K2PostHog alternatives: LogRocket, Mouseflow

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallHotjar alternatives: Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Qwen 3.7 FlashLogRocket alternatives: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
GPT-6 LunaFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, PostHog

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Hotjar, Mouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Microsoft Clarity
GPT-5.4 miniFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
Perplexity SonarHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Grok 4.20Hotjar alternatives: Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
DeepSeek V4 FlashHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Llama 4 MaverickMouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, UXCam
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Clarity alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, UXCam
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Clarity alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket
Muse Glimmer 30BFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Dealfront leads by four points.
Dealfront8%#– of 11
PostHog4%#3 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Dealfront leads by six points.
Dealfront12%#3 of 16
PostHog6%#5 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: PostHog leads at enterprise.
PostHog2%#8 of 12
Dealfront0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Dealfront

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about PostHog

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared
Microsoft Clarity vs DealfrontMicrosoft Clarity vs PostHogHotjar vs DealfrontHotjar vs PostHogDealfront vs FullstoryDealfront vs MouseflowDealfront vs LogRocketDealfront vs ContentsquareFullstory vs PostHogPostHog vs MouseflowPostHog vs LogRocketPostHog vs ContentsquareAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full session replay standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.