Session replay and heatmaps · November 2026 Edition
Dealfront vs LogRocket
Zero of fourteen models named Dealfront first on the direct prompt; one named LogRocket. Dealfront was named by ten of the fourteen models and LogRocket by fourteen and Dealfront carries 10 labels and LogRocket 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share12%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1037A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Dealfront reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Clarity was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Clarity vs Dealfront · Microsoft Clarity vs LogRocket · Hotjar vs Dealfront
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the session replay and heatmaps page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DealfrontFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLogRocket
Direct01
Paraphrase60
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative004 against LogRocket
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Dealfront and LogRocket stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Dealfront LogRocket first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Dealfront on the left and LogRocket on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Dealfront and LogRocket stood in it.
LogRocket first, Dealfront not the choice
1 of 14 modelsDealfront was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashLogRocket alternatives: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
Gemini 3.5 FlashPostHog alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Mistral SmallHotjar alternatives: Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
DeepSeek V4 FlashHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Kimi K2PostHog alternatives: LogRocket, Mouseflow
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Clarity alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, UXCam
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Clarity alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Hotjar, Mouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Microsoft Clarity
Perplexity SonarHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Grok 4.20Hotjar alternatives: Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Llama 4 MaverickMouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, UXCam
GPT-6 LunaFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, PostHog
Muse Glimmer 30BFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Dealfront leads by eight points.
Dealfront8%#– of 11LogRocket0%#8 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: LogRocket leads at enterprise.
LogRocket2%#7 of 12Dealfront0%#– of 12What the models said about Dealfront
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about LogRocket
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“text masking beyond sensitive fields may require configuration; its ability to capture application state... increases the amount of potentially sensitive data collected” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“treat Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, FullStory, Mouseflow, LogRocket and Smartlook as high-risk” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“More developer-focused; less intuitive for non-technical marketing teams; can be overkill” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“LogRocket is widely considered the gold standard for mid-market B2B.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Product & Developer Focus | FullStory, LogRocket | Heavy on console logs, network errors, quantitative analytics + replay.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
“One More Option Worth Considering: LogRocket (from $69/month) is excellent if your B2B product is primarily web-app focused” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Clarity vs DealfrontMicrosoft Clarity vs LogRocketHotjar vs DealfrontHotjar vs LogRocketDealfront vs FullstoryDealfront vs PostHogDealfront vs MouseflowDealfront vs ContentsquareFullstory vs LogRocketPostHog vs LogRocketMouseflow vs LogRocketLogRocket vs ContentsquareAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full session replay standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.