Index › GTM › Customer › Community › Discourse vs Facebook Groups
Community platforms · November 2026 Edition

Discourse vs Facebook Groups

Zero of fourteen models named Discourse first on the direct prompt; zero named Facebook Groups. Discourse was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Facebook Groups by six and Discourse carries 45 labels and Facebook Groups 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Discourse

accepted challenger

founded 2013. Named in one category this edition.

Facebook Groups

criticized challenger

By Facebook, Colombia, founded 2004. Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share18%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%40%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4510A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Discourse reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Bettermode was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Bettermode vs Discourse · Bettermode vs Facebook Groups · Discourse vs Higher Logic Vanilla

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the community platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DiscourseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFacebook Groups
Direct00
Paraphrase102 against Discourse
Comparative00
Budget-constrained81
Scale-constrained001 against Discourse
Negative101 against Discourse · 4 against Facebook Groups
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Discourse and Facebook Groups were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 143 answers naming Discourse and the 35 naming Facebook Groups. In those answers Facebook Groups took the first choice zero times and Discourse three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Discourse and Facebook Groups stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Discourse Facebook Groups first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Discourse on the left and Facebook Groups on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Discourse and Facebook Groups stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGainsight Customer Communities, Higher Logic Vanilla alternatives: Bettermode, Discourse
Grok 4.20Bettermode alternatives: Circle, Discourse, Gainsight Customer Communities

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Bettermode alternatives: Gainsight Customer Communities, Higher Logic Vanilla
GPT-5.4 miniGainsight Customer Communities alternatives: Higher Logic Vanilla, Salesforce Experience Cloud
Perplexity SonarBettermode alternatives: Gainsight Customer Communities
Mistral SmallBettermode alternatives: Higher Logic Vanilla, Influitive
DeepSeek V4 FlashHigher Logic Vanilla alternatives: Gainsight Customer Communities, Khoros Communities
Llama 4 MaverickCircle
Qwen 3.7 FlashBettermode, Circle alternatives: Salesforce Experience Cloud, Zendesk Community
Kimi K2Bettermode alternatives: Gainsight Customer Communities, Influitive
GLM 4.7 FlashXBettermode alternatives: Circle, Higher Logic Vanilla, Influitive
MiniMax M2.5Bettermode alternatives: Circle, Influitive, Salesforce Experience Cloud
GPT-6 LunaHigher Logic Vanilla alternatives: Bettermode, Gainsight Customer Communities
Muse Glimmer 30BHigher Logic Vanilla alternatives: Bettermode, Circle, Gainsight Customer Communities, Salesforce Experience Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Discourse leads by thirty-one points.
Discourse31%#2 of 12
Facebook Groups0%#11 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Discourse leads by sixteen points.
Discourse18%#2 of 12
Facebook Groups2%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Discourse leads by four points.
Discourse4%#5 of 10
Facebook Groups0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Discourse

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“basic forums like Discourse (lacks B2B-specific features)” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Excellent search and moderation; less "modern visual portal" aesthetic out of the box.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“the hosted version starts at ~$100/mo and can get pricey with scaling” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“open-source, self-hostable, transparent pricing (from $100/mo), full data ownership, no lock-in” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Absolute minimum budget: Start with Discourse (free) or Thinkific ($5/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Discourse if you want the best mix of capability, control, and cost-effectiveness.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Facebook Groups

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“These are convenient but risky for branded customer communities due to algorithm changes, data ownership loss, privacy scandals, and lack of control.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Facebook Groups lack data ownership, have limited branding options, and are subject to algorithm changes” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“No data ownership, algorithm changes disrupt reach, limited business features, privacy concerns” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“the best customer community platform is often Facebook Groups (completely free)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Completely free and leverages a platform most people already use. Good for informal communities but less branded.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
“Zero budget + no technical team: Use Discord, Facebook Groups, or Geneva.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.