UserGuiding vs Planhat
Zero of fourteen models named UserGuiding first on the direct prompt; one named Planhat. UserGuiding was named by nine of the fourteen models and Planhat by twelve and UserGuiding carries 12 labels and Planhat 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client onboarding platforms page.
By framing
UserGuidingFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPlanhat
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
UserGuiding Planhat first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, UserGuiding on the left and Planhat on the right.The direct prompt
Planhat first, UserGuiding not the choice
1 of 14 modelsUserGuiding was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
UserGuiding2%#– of 17Planhat0%#– of 17UserGuiding6%#3 of 16Planhat2%#5 of 16UserGuiding—not namedPlanhat0%#7 of 13What the models said about UserGuiding
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Can feel overwhelming or "spammy" if overused ... Enterprise-focused pricing and complexity make them risky” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“often criticized for being challengers with limited capabilities” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“UserGuiding is budget-friendly for self-serve onboarding at $89/month annually, making it the most affordable option on many comparison lists” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best client onboarding platform for a company with a limited budget is UserGuiding, as it offers a fast and low-cost setup” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Planhat
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Planhat users regularly report integration issues that cause challenges in data management and trustworthiness among teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Onboarding is a module, not the core product ... Not ideal if onboarding is your primary pain point” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Rocketlane and Planhat are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.