GUIDEcx vs Dock
Seven of fourteen models named GUIDEcx first on the direct prompt; zero named Dock. GUIDEcx was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Dock by thirteen and GUIDEcx carries 51 labels and Dock 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2021. Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client onboarding platforms page.
By framing
GUIDEcxFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDock
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, GUIDEcx and Dock were named in the same answer fifty-five times, of the 147 answers naming GUIDEcx and the 281 naming Dock. In those answers Dock took the first choice three times and GUIDEcx twelve.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | ||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
GUIDEcx Dock first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GUIDEcx on the left and Dock on the right.The direct prompt
GUIDEcx first, Dock an alternative
7 of 14 modelsDock was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
GUIDEcx9%#4 of 17Dock9%#3 of 17What the models said about GUIDEcx
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Frequently cited in Reddit threads ... as a "mixed bag" for client adoption ... High implementation effort; some users report it feels rigid.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Over-Engineered Enterprise Implementation Software (for SMBs & Agencies)... Complex enterprise implementation tools (e.g., GuideCX)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Starting at ~$143/user/month with minimum seat requirements and steep administrative setup—may be overkill for smaller teams” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for mid-market implementation teams handling multi-stakeholder projects, offering guest task views and automated email updates” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“GUIDEcx is a recommended customer implementation and onboarding project tool for mid-sized B2B companies” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“GUIDECX — strong for structured, collaborative onboarding projects and shared accountability.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Dock
No label in this category carried a quote.
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.