Seven of fourteen models named Rocketlane first on the direct prompt; seven named GUIDEcx. Both were named by all fourteen models and Rocketlane carries 58 labels and GUIDEcx 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client onboarding platforms page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Rocketlane and GUIDEcx were named in the same answer 136 times, of the 186 answers naming Rocketlane and the 147 naming GUIDEcx. In those answers GUIDEcx took the first choice thirty times and Rocketlane fifty-four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“known performance issues that have led some analysts to advise steering clear of it” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier options like Rocketlane (~$19+/user/month)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“It may be worth being cautious about if you need heavy customization or have a complex, large-scale onboarding workflow.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rocketlane and Planhat are the top recommendations due to their robust features, ease of use, and strong alignment with mid-market needs” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Rocketlane: Top for ease of use, client portals, tasks, and projections (4.7/5, starts ~$49/user/year). Strong for collaborative onboarding.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Rocketlane if onboarding involves implementation projects, billable services, staffing, or resource planning.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Frequently cited in Reddit threads ... as a "mixed bag" for client adoption ... High implementation effort; some users report it feels rigid.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Over-Engineered Enterprise Implementation Software (for SMBs & Agencies)... Complex enterprise implementation tools (e.g., GuideCX)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Starting at ~$143/user/month with minimum seat requirements and steep administrative setup—may be overkill for smaller teams” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for mid-market implementation teams handling multi-stakeholder projects, offering guest task views and automated email updates” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“GUIDEcx is a recommended customer implementation and onboarding project tool for mid-sized B2B companies” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“GUIDECX — strong for structured, collaborative onboarding projects and shared accountability.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.