Index › Finance › Receivables and billing › Ecommerce fraud › Signifyd vs Forter
Ecommerce fraud prevention · November 2026 Edition

Signifyd vs Forter

Five of fourteen models named Signifyd first on the direct prompt; zero named Forter. Both were named by all fourteen models and Signifyd carries 57 labels and Forter 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Signifyd

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Forter

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate23%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5733A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Signifyd reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sift was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Stripe Radar vs Signifyd · Stripe Radar vs Forter · Signifyd vs SEON

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SignifydFirst choices, of fourteen modelsForter
Direct501 against Signifyd · 2 against Forter
Paraphrase101 against Signifyd
Comparative52
Budget-constrained004 against Signifyd · 2 against Forter
Scale-constrained11
Negative007 against Signifyd · 2 against Forter
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Signifyd and Forter were named in the same answer ninety-two times, of the 216 answers naming Signifyd and the 99 naming Forter. In those answers Forter took the first choice five times and Signifyd eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Signifyd and Forter stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Signifyd Forter first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Signifyd on the left and Forter on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Signifyd and Forter stood in it.

Signifyd first, Forter not the choice

5 of 14 modelsForter was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarSignifyd alternatives: ClearSale, SEON, Sift
Mistral SmallClearSale, Signifyd alternatives: Stripe Radar, Sumsub
Llama 4 MaverickSignifyd
Kimi K2Signifyd alternatives: SEON, Sift, Wyllo
GPT-6 LunaSignifyd alternatives: Kount, Sift, Trustmi

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Trustpair alternatives: Riskified, SEON, Signifyd
GPT-5.4 miniSift alternatives: Forter, Riskified, Signifyd
Grok 4.20SEON alternatives: ClearSale, Sift, Signifyd, Stripe Radar
DeepSeek V4 FlashSEON alternatives: Sift, Signifyd
Qwen 3.7 FlashSift alternatives: LexisNexis Intelligent Investigator, Ping Identity, Signifyd, Wyllo
GLM 4.7 FlashXStripe Radar alternatives: SEON, Signifyd
Muse Glimmer 30BClearSale alternatives: SEON, Sift, Signifyd, Trustpair

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashSift alternatives: Kount, SEON, Trustmi AI
MiniMax M2.5ClearSale, SEON, Sift alternatives: Kount

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Signifyd leads by twelve points.
Signifyd12%#3 of 14
Forter0%#14 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Signifyd leads by eleven points.
Signifyd13%#2 of 11
Forter2%#8 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Signifyd leads by eight points.
Signifyd12%#3 of 15
Forter4%#7 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Signifyd

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“reviews highlight issues with accuracy and billing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“far more accessible than enterprise-focused tools like Signifyd, Riskified, or Sift, which often target mid-market+ businesses and can cost thousands per month” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Guaranteed protection, zero liability for approved orders. | Higher fees per order; potential increase in false decline rates on borderline orders.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“One of the most widely adopted platforms, especially for mid-to-large merchants on Shopify, Magento, and BigCommerce.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Compare Signifyd or Riskified if your priority is covered chargeback exposure and automated order decisions.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best ecommerce fraud prevention platform for a mid-market B2B company is Signifyd.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Forter

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid enterprise platforms like Riskified, Forter, and Kount” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Premium pricing: Listed at $120K/year on AWS Marketplace for under 1M decisions—significantly more expensive than competitors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“if you need enterprise-grade protection with chargeback guarantees (though they're primarily enterprise-focused)” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Tier 1 (Enterprise/High Touch): Forter, Signifyd. (High cost, full liability guarantee, heavy focus on human-in-the-loop workflows).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Riskified or Forter for high-volume retail, international sales, and aggressive false-decline reduction.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“It is widely considered the industry standard for high-volume transactions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.