Prophix vs Cube
One of fourteen models named Prophix first on the direct prompt; one named Cube. Prophix was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Cube by thirteen and Prophix carries 34 labels and Cube 53, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the FP&A platforms page.
By framing
ProphixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCube
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Prophix and Cube were named in the same answer seventy times, of the 262 answers naming Prophix and the 352 naming Cube. In those answers Cube took the first choice fourteen times and Prophix eleven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | ||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Prophix Cube first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Prophix on the left and Cube on the right.The direct prompt
Prophix first, Cube an alternative
1 of 14 modelsCube was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Cube first, Prophix not the choice
1 of 14 modelsProphix was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Prophix14%#2 of 14Cube12%#3 of 14Cube4%#7 of 14Prophix0%#13 of 14What the models said about Prophix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Prophix often receives significantly fewer positive mentions and lower "positive-to-negative" ratios” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
What the models said about Cube
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Excel-adjacent tools like Datarails, Cube, and Vena may not be suitable for long-term scalability in large enterprises” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“median pricing for those lands in the $30,000+ range—typically too expensive for "limited budget" teams” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best FP&A software for a company with a limited budget is Cube, which offers a free plan and paid plans starting at $40-$80/user/mo.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.