FP&A platforms · November 2026 Edition
Aleph vs Workday Adaptive Planning
Three of fourteen models named Aleph first on the direct prompt; one named Workday Adaptive Planning. Aleph was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Workday Adaptive Planning by fourteen and Aleph carries 25 labels and Workday Adaptive Planning 62, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
First-choice share9%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%35%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2562A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Aleph reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Prophix was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Pigment vs Aleph · Pigment vs Workday Adaptive Planning · Prophix vs Aleph
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the FP&A platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AlephFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkday Adaptive Planning
Direct311 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Paraphrase13
Comparative011 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Budget-constrained007 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Scale-constrained103 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Negative0010 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Aleph and Workday Adaptive Planning stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Aleph Workday Adaptive Planning first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Aleph on the left and Workday Adaptive Planning on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Aleph and Workday Adaptive Planning stood in it.
Aleph first, Workday Adaptive Planning an alternative
3 of 14 modelsWorkday Adaptive Planning was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickAleph, Pigment, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning
MiniMax M2.5Aleph, Pigment alternatives: Prophix, Vena
Muse Glimmer 30BAleph, Pigment alternatives: Centage, Cube, Datarails, Prophix, Vena
Workday Adaptive Planning first, Aleph not the choice
1 of 14 modelsAleph was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashPlanful, Workday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Centage, Cube, Vena
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniVena alternatives: Anaplan, Datarails, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Perplexity SonarPigment alternatives: Aleph, Planful, Prophix
DeepSeek V4 FlashPigment alternatives: Aleph, Prophix
Kimi K2Pigment alternatives: Aleph, Datarails, Prophix, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXPigment alternatives: Aleph, Prophix
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Planful alternatives: Cube, Prophix, Vena
Gemini 3.5 FlashAbacum, Mosaic alternatives: Cube, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Vena
Grok 4.20Cube alternatives: Centage, Maxio, Planful, Vena
Mistral SmallPlanful alternatives: Pigment, Prophix
GPT-6 LunaPigment alternatives: Adaptive from Workday, Planful, Vena
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Aleph leads by five points.
Aleph5%#5 of 17Workday Adaptive Planning0%#16 of 17Mid-marketThe figures above
Aleph leads by two points.
Aleph9%#4 of 14Workday Adaptive Planning7%#6 of 14Enterprise
The order flips: Workday Adaptive Planning leads at enterprise.
Workday Adaptive Planning11%#3 of 14Aleph0%#– of 14What the models said about Aleph
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“I'd suggest starting with Aleph if your team is spreadsheet-centric and wants quick implementation” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Currently showing high market share... Look closely at Aleph or Cubesoftware.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Workday Adaptive Planning
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Avoid the mid-market "contact us" vendors (Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Pigment, Planful)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Workday Adaptive Planning and Prophix One are the most recommended due to their balance of functionality, scalability, and user-friendliness” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Pigment vs AlephPigment vs Workday Adaptive PlanningProphix vs AlephProphix vs Workday Adaptive PlanningCube vs AlephCube vs Workday Adaptive PlanningAleph vs PlanfulAleph vs VenaAleph vs JiravPlanful vs Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planning vs VenaWorkday Adaptive Planning vs JiravAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full FP&A platforms standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.