OnBoard vs Zeck
Eight of fourteen models named OnBoard first on the direct prompt; one named Zeck. OnBoard was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Zeck by six and OnBoard carries 41 labels and Zeck 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
By framing
OnBoardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZeck
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
OnBoard Zeck first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OnBoard on the left and Zeck on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.OnBoard first, Zeck not the choice
7 of 14 modelsZeck was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
OnBoard2%#7 of 12Zeck2%#– of 12What the models said about OnBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Skip enterprise-grade tools like ... and OnBoard (~$5,000/year minimum)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if: Downtime could disrupt compliance or decision-making.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“OnBoard Board Management Software: To take in mind — Limited page customization options; Feature usability and limitations; Document upload delays and issues.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“OnBoard (by Passageways) stands out as the best overall board reporting and management software for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“The safest approach remains: Specialist board portal (e.g., OnBoard, BoardEffect, or BoardPro for SMEs) + strict policy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Zeck
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Go with Zeck (for a modern web-first deck with engagement tracking)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Look for intuitive, secure modern Board Portals (e.g., OnBoard, Board Intelligence, Zeck, Diligent, Admincontrol)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.