OnBoard vs Boardable
Eight of fourteen models named OnBoard first on the direct prompt; zero named Boardable. Both were named by all fourteen models and OnBoard carries 41 labels and Boardable 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
By framing
OnBoardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoardable
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, OnBoard and Boardable were named in the same answer 119 times, of the 286 answers naming OnBoard and the 191 naming Boardable. In those answers Boardable took the first choice nineteen times and OnBoard twelve.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
OnBoard Boardable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OnBoard on the left and Boardable on the right.The direct prompt
OnBoard first, Boardable an alternative
8 of 14 modelsBoardable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Boardable12%#4 of 12OnBoard2%#7 of 12OnBoard16%#1 of 13Boardable13%#2 of 13What the models said about OnBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Skip enterprise-grade tools like ... and OnBoard (~$5,000/year minimum)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if: Downtime could disrupt compliance or decision-making.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“OnBoard Board Management Software: To take in mind — Limited page customization options; Feature usability and limitations; Document upload delays and issues.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“OnBoard (by Passageways) stands out as the best overall board reporting and management software for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“The safest approach remains: Specialist board portal (e.g., OnBoard, BoardEffect, or BoardPro for SMEs) + strict policy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Boardable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Caution: If your needs scale beyond basic nonprofit governance—may require supplements.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Boardable is often the strongest starting point for board reporting/board management because it has a very low starting price ($20.99/month)” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“The best board reporting software for a company with a limited budget is Boardable, which is a budget-friendly option with a low entry cost” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses or nonprofits, Boardable or AppDeck are likely the best balance of affordability and functionality.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.