Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › Board › Boardable vs Zeck
Board and investor reporting · November 2026 Edition

Boardable vs Zeck

Zero of fourteen models named Boardable first on the direct prompt; one named Zeck. Boardable was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Zeck by six and Boardable carries 30 labels and Zeck 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Boardable

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Zeck

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3010A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Boardable reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs Boardable · OnBoard vs Zeck · Boardable vs AppDeck Board Portal

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardableFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZeck
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained70
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Boardable
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Boardable and Zeck stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Boardable Zeck first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Boardable on the left and Zeck on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Boardable and Zeck stood in it.

Zeck first, Boardable not the choice

1 of 14 modelsBoardable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, OnBoard, Zeck alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Govenda

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20OnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Boardable
Qwen 3.7 FlashFairview alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardPro, OnBoard, Zeck
GPT-6 LunaOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Boardable

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Govenda
GPT-5.4 miniBoard Intelligence, OnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: Fairview, Planful, Prophix
Mistral SmallFairview alternatives: Azeus Convene, Mosaic
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Ideals Board
Llama 4 MaverickFairview alternatives: BoardEffect, Mosaic, OnBoard
Kimi K2AppDeck Board Portal, BoardPro alternatives: Board Intelligence, OnBoard
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppDeck Board Portal alternatives: BoardPro, Fathom, OnBoard
MiniMax M2.5Fairview alternatives: Aleph, Mosaic
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardEffect, Diligent Boards

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Boardable leads by ten points.
Boardable12%#4 of 12
Zeck2%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Boardable leads by eleven points.
Boardable13%#2 of 13
Zeck2%#6 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Boardable leads by four points.
Boardable4%#7 of 12
Zeck0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Boardable

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Caution: If your needs scale beyond basic nonprofit governance—may require supplements.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Boardable is often the strongest starting point for board reporting/board management because it has a very low starting price ($20.99/month)” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“The best board reporting software for a company with a limited budget is Boardable, which is a budget-friendly option with a low entry cost” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses or nonprofits, Boardable or AppDeck are likely the best balance of affordability and functionality.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Zeck

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Go with Zeck (for a modern web-first deck with engagement tracking)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Look for intuitive, secure modern Board Portals (e.g., OnBoard, Board Intelligence, Zeck, Diligent, Admincontrol)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.