Entity management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “legal entity management software”, and as “corporate governance and entity management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 46 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
39%
Contested · Athennian 20%
39Diligent Entities20Athennian11CSC Entity Management30others
39% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Athennian vs FilejetAthennian vs Diligent EntitiesAthennian vs MinuteBoxEntityKeeper vs CommendaEntityKeeper vs ContractZenEntityKeeper vs FilejetEntityKeeper vs Diligent EntitiesEntityKeeper vs MinuteBoxCommenda vs ContractZenCommenda vs FilejetCommenda vs Diligent EntitiesCommenda vs MinuteBoxContractZen vs FilejetContractZen vs Diligent EntitiesContractZen vs MinuteBoxFilejet vs Diligent EntitiesFilejet vs MinuteBoxDiligent Entities vs MinuteBox
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Diligent Entities39%
Diligent Entities39%02Athennian20%
Athennian20%03CSC Entity Management11%
CSC Entity Management11%04Computershare GEMS2%
Computershare GEMS2%05Wolters Kluwer Legisway2%
Wolters Kluwer Legisway2%06EntityKeeper2%
EntityKeeper2%07MinuteBox0%
MinuteBox0%08CT Corporation Entity Management0%
CT Corporation Entity Management0%What they warned about
Six of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
CSC Entity Management18%
6 of 34 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“large enterprises should be cautious about or avoid the following types of entity management tools: 1. Heavy Corporate Services Firms (e.g., CSC Global, Intertrust, Computershare)” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Computershare GEMS21%
6 of 29 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Heavy Corporate Services Firms (e.g., CSC Global, Intertrust, Computershare) ... overly complex and expensive for most large enterprises” Mistral Small, negative prompt
EntityKeeper36%
5 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Legacy/Standalone Entity Databases (e.g., Basic Spreadsheets or Early CRMs like Generic "EntityKeeper" for Scale-Up Beyond Small Portfolios)” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Microsoft Excel100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Large enterprises should strongly avoid relying on spreadsheets, Microsoft Excel, or manual processes for entity management.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1065 links across 200 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Worldmetrics33 answers · 81 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Diligent33 answers · 64 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Coverpin32 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Athennian25 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Discern22 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 35 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · MinuteBox19 answers · 34 citations · 8 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GetApp18 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best legal entity management software”, “entity management tools”, “legal entity management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diligent diligent.com Diligent Entities 39%, Diligent Boards 2%, Diligent One Platform 0% | 41% | 272 | 165,000 | 6,449 | 317,551 company | $287 | 120 | 3 |
| Athennian athennian.com | 20% | 129 | 390 | 8 | 6,319 | 3 | 1 | |
| CSC cscglobal.com CSC Entity Management 11% | 11% | 92 | 110 | 2 | 100,643 company | $72 | 49 | 2 |
| Lextree lextree.ai | 7% | 18 | 70 | 1 | 2 | |||
| LegalX legalxindia.com | 4% | 880 | 3 | 75 | ||||
| Computershare computershare.com Computershare GEMS 2% | 2% | 25 | 90 | 0 | 416,475 company | 19 | ||
| Wolters Kluwer wolterskluwer.com Wolters Kluwer Legisway 2%, CT Corporation Entity Management 0% | 2% | 18 | 33,100 | 1,329 | 2,373,906 company | $15,481 | 28 | 1 |
| EnGlobe | 2% | 480 | 55 | |||||
| EntityKeeper entitykeeper.com | 2% | 91 | 90 | 0 | 617 | 5 | ||
| Commenda commenda.io | 2% | 70 | 390 | 5 | 569,684 | $5,224 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (athennian.com, diligent.com, g2.com, minutebox.com). The first result for “best legal entity management software” is wolterskluwer.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best legal entity management software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which corporate governance and entity management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade entity management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best legal entity management software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a legal entity management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which entity management tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Diligent EntitiesDiligent Entities, Nasdaq Governance ServicesChangedDiligent Entitiesagainst: CSC Entity ManagementAthennian, Diligent Entitiesno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
One alternative
CT Corporation Entity ManagementTwo alternatives
Computershare GEMS, EquinixThree alternatives
Athennian, Commenda, DiliTrust Entity ManagementOne alternative
MinuteBoxGPT-5.4 miniDiligent EntitiesDiligent EntitiesHeldno first choiceWolters Kluwer Legiswayno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CT Corporation Entity Management, Wolters Kluwer LegiswayOne alternative
Diligent BoardsOne alternative
Diligent EntitiesGemini 3.5 FlashAthennianAthennianHeldagainst: CSC Entity ManagementDiligent EntitiesCSC Entity Managementagainst: Diligent Entities, salesforce-based legal packagesAthennianagainst: Diligent Entitiesagainst: Blueprint OneWorld, Computershare GEMS, Diligent Boards, EntityKeeper, Filejet, Microsoft Excel, OnBoard, SharePoint
Four alternatives
CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, Diligent Entities, MinuteBoxTwo alternatives
Computershare GEMS, Diligent EntitiesFive alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, MinuteBox, Wolters KluwerFour alternatives
Athennian, EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBoxTwo alternatives
CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMSPerplexity SonarDiligent Entitiesagainst: Athennian, CSC Entity Management, Commenda, MinuteBoxDiligent EntitiesHeldno first choiceCSC Entity Managementno first choiceagainst: EntityKeeper
Two alternatives
Computershare GEMS, Wolters Kluwer LegiswayThree alternatives
MetricStream, OneTrust, ServiceNow GRCOne alternative
Wolters Kluwer LegiswayGrok 4.20Athennian, Diligent EntitiesDiligent EntitiesChangedagainst: AthennianDiligent EntitiesEntityKeeperagainst: Athennian, Diligent EntitiesDiligenagainst: Blueprint OneWorld, CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, Diligent Entities, Encompass, EntityKeeper, Sage Intacct
One alternative
Computershare GEMSTwo alternatives
Computershare GEMS, MetricStreamFour alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, EnGlobeOne alternative
CSC Entity ManagementTwo alternatives
Klea, TeamedMistral SmallCommendaDiligent EntitiesChangedno first choiceLextreeDiligent Entitiesagainst: CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, Intertrust
Two alternatives
DiliTrust Entity Management, LegalXOne alternative
Computershare GEMSFour alternatives
Conga Compliance Cloud, Covisint, Ontra, PwC's GLIMRDeepSeek V4 FlashDiligent EntitiesDiligent EntitiesHeldDiligent Entitiesagainst: Computershare GEMSAthennianagainst: CSC / CT Corporation, Diligent Entities, XakiaAthennianagainst: CT/CSC, EntityKeeper, Wolters Kluwer Legiswaynothing named
Two alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity ManagementTwo alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity ManagementFive alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity Management, DiliTrust Entity Management, EntityKeeper, Wolters Kluwer LegiswayTwo alternatives
EntityKeeper, NEWTONTwo alternatives
Diligent Entities, MinuteBoxLlama 4 MaverickLegalXEnGlobeChangedno first choiceLegalXno first choicenothing named
One alternative
GSITwo alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity ManagementTwo alternatives
Discern, Wolters Kluwer LegiswayQwen 3.7 FlashDiscernDiligent BoardsChangedDiligent One Platformagainst: Generic OptionsLextreeagainst: Computershare GEMS, Diligent Entitiesno first choiceagainst: Commenda, Diligent Entities, Discern, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
Computershare GEMS, HighQ, Mitratech, OneTrustTwo alternatives
Athennian, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Onit, TrustmoorKimi K2Diligent EntitiesDiligent EntitiesHeldComputershare GEMS, EnGlobeCSC Entity Managementagainst: EntityFlono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity ManagementThree alternatives
CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, MetricStreamFour alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Diligent EntitiesOne alternative
Diligent EntitiesGLM 4.7 FlashXDiligent EntitiesDiligent EntitiesHeldagainst: CartaEnGlobeAthennian, Lextreeno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, Dropbox, Intertrust, Microsoft Excel, SharePoint
Two alternatives
Atlas, Computershare GEMSTwo alternatives
Computershare GEMS, EnGlobeEight alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity Management, Carta, Computershare GEMS, Corporify, DiliTrust Entity Management, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeperThree alternatives
CSC Entity Management, Filejet, MinuteBoxMiniMax M2.5Athennian, Diligent EntitiesCSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMSChangedCSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMSCSC Entity Managementagainst: EntityKeeper, Xakiano first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Athennian, CartaFour alternatives
Athennian, Carta, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeperBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:12 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:48 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:56 | yes | 14 | 58 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:58 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:25 | yes | 21 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:59 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 19:35 | yes | 26 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:10 | yes | 8 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:23 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 23 | 129 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:57 | yes | 8 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:47 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:08 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:11 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:46 | yes | 16 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:09 | yes | 38 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:40 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:10 | yes | 26 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:37 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:18 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:39 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:01 | yes | 28 | 82 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:21 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:45 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:45 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 26 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:21 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:56 | yes | 30 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:37 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 19:29 | yes | 27 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:35 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:51 | yes | 28 | 36 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:09 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:23 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:29 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:19 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:12 | yes | 29 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:49 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:03 | yes | 36 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:52 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:33 | yes | 13 | 80 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:18 | yes | 26 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:54 | yes | 21 | 105 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:52 | yes | 15 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:19 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:37 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:15 | yes | 13 | 145 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:02 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:03 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:41 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 19:18 | yes | 29 | 89 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:08 | no | 0 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:01 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:40 | yes | 19 | 117 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:36 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:17 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:55 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:07 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:34 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:07 | yes | 22 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:55 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 21:06 | yes | 28 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:57 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:52 | yes | 24 | 84 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:03 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:33 | yes | 19 | 128 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:07 | yes | 9 | 44 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CSC read as CSC Entity Management
CSC (Corporate Service Corporation) read as CSC Entity Management
CSC (Corporation Service Company) read as CSC Entity Management
CT Corporation read as CT Corporation Entity Management
CT Corporation (Wolters Kluwer) read as CT Corporation Entity Management
Computershare read as Computershare GEMS
DiliTrust read as DiliTrust Entity Management
DiliTrust Governance Suite read as DiliTrust Entity Management
Diligent read as Diligent Entities
Diligent (Legisway) read as Diligent Entities
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Informatica MDM read as Informatica
Microsoft SharePoint read as SharePoint
Unresolved, counted raw
Amperity
Blueprism/UiPath-led customized flows
CT/CSC
Collibra
Conga Compliance Cloud
Covisint (now part of OpenText)
Diligen (DiliTrust)
Equinix
GSI
Generic Options (SharePoint/Excel)
Hightouch
LexisNexis Entity Management
LiveRamp
Nasdaq Governance Services
Oracle MDM
PwC's GLIMR
Salesforce Data 360
TMF Group / Vistra
Tealium
Teamed
Treasure Data
Trustmoor
Zeotap
salesforce-based legal packages
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.