Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › Finance › Equity and corporate › Board portals › OnBoard vs Easy Board
Board portals · November 2026 Edition

OnBoard vs Easy Board

Fourteen of fourteen models named OnBoard first on the direct prompt; zero named Easy Board. OnBoard was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Easy Board by nine and OnBoard carries 61 labels and Easy Board 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

OnBoard

endorsed leader

Named in three categories this edition.

Easy Board

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share52%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels6110A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, OnBoard reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard vs BoardPro · OnBoard vs Boardable · OnBoard vs Nasdaq Boardvantage

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board portals page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OnBoardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsEasy Board
Direct140
Paraphrase110
Comparative10
Budget-constrained033 against OnBoard
Scale-constrained30
Negative104 against OnBoard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where OnBoard and Easy Board stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
OnBoard Easy Board first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OnBoard on the left and Easy Board on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where OnBoard and Easy Board stood in it.

OnBoard first, Easy Board not the choice

14 of 14 modelsEasy Board was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda
GPT-5.4 miniOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Gemini 3.5 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Azeus Convene, Govenda
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck, Boardable
Grok 4.20OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardPro
Mistral SmallNasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardPro
Llama 4 MaverickOnBoard
Qwen 3.7 FlashOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Boardable
Kimi K2BoardPro, OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal
GLM 4.7 FlashXBoardPro, OnBoard alternatives: AppDeck
MiniMax M2.5OnBoard alternatives: AppDeck, BoardEffect, BoardMaps, BoardPro
GPT-6 LunaOnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard, Zeck alternatives: AppDeck

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
OnBoard leads by nine points.
OnBoard11%#3 of 9
Easy Board2%#5 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
OnBoard leads by forty-six points.
OnBoard52%#1 of 12
Easy Board6%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Easy Board is not named for this buyer.
OnBoard13%#2 of 9
Easy Board—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about OnBoard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“What to Avoid - Diligent, OnBoard, and BoardEffect” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Mid-Market Leaders (Often the sweet spot for 500-person companies): OnBoard (Passageways): Highly rated for ease of use, intuitive design, and mid-market value.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“OnBoard is frequently highlighted as the best overall balanced option for mid-market companies seeking modern functionality without enterprise pricing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Easy Board

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“For the most budget-conscious option, Easy Board's Mini plan at $49/month with free first users appears to offer the best initial value.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have a small board (under 10 members), Easy Board at $49/month offers the best value.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Easy Board is probably the best place to start for a small or nonprofit board” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
OnBoard vs BoardProOnBoard vs BoardableOnBoard vs Nasdaq BoardvantageBoardPro vs Easy BoardBoardable vs Easy BoardNasdaq Boardvantage vs Easy BoardAll ten head-to-head pages and the full board portals standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.