OnBoard vs Boardable
Fourteen of fourteen models named OnBoard first on the direct prompt; zero named Boardable. OnBoard was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Boardable by thirteen and OnBoard carries 61 labels and Boardable 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board portals page.
By framing
OnBoardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoardable
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, OnBoard and Boardable were named in the same answer 119 times, of the 286 answers naming OnBoard and the 191 naming Boardable. In those answers Boardable took the first choice nineteen times and OnBoard twelve.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | ||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
OnBoard Boardable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OnBoard on the left and Boardable on the right.The direct prompt
OnBoard first, Boardable an alternative
14 of 14 modelsBoardable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Boardable17%#2 of 9OnBoard11%#3 of 9OnBoard52%#1 of 12Boardable11%#3 of 12What the models said about OnBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“What to Avoid - Diligent, OnBoard, and BoardEffect” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Mid-Market Leaders (Often the sweet spot for 500-person companies): OnBoard (Passageways): Highly rated for ease of use, intuitive design, and mid-market value.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“OnBoard is frequently highlighted as the best overall balanced option for mid-market companies seeking modern functionality without enterprise pricing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Boardable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“60% negative rate in AI analysis; criticized challenger status” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“SMB-focused tools (like Boardable) may lack the governance features, integrations, or compliance standards needed by mid-market B2B leadership” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Boardable requires 30 days’ notice of cancellation before your subscription runs out, so be wary.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best board portal for a company with a limited budget is Boardable, which costs $20.99-$35.99 per user per month.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.