Index › Finance › Equity and corporate › Board portals › BoardPro vs Boardable
Board portals · November 2026 Edition

BoardPro vs Boardable

Two of fourteen models named BoardPro first on the direct prompt; zero named Boardable. BoardPro was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Boardable by thirteen and BoardPro carries 46 labels and Boardable 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BoardPro

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Boardable

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share20%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4637A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BoardPro reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs BoardPro · OnBoard vs Boardable · BoardPro vs Nasdaq Boardvantage

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board portals page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardProFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoardable
Direct201 against Boardable
Paraphrase30
Comparative00
Budget-constrained661 against BoardPro
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against BoardPro · 2 against Boardable
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, BoardPro and Boardable were named in the same answer 131 times, of the 202 answers naming BoardPro and the 191 naming Boardable. In those answers Boardable took the first choice twenty-one times and BoardPro forty-eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BoardPro and Boardable stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BoardPro Boardable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BoardPro on the left and Boardable on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BoardPro and Boardable stood in it.

BoardPro first, Boardable not the choice

2 of 14 modelsBoardable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2BoardPro, OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal
GLM 4.7 FlashXBoardPro, OnBoard alternatives: AppDeck

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck, Boardable
Grok 4.20OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardPro
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardPro
Qwen 3.7 FlashOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Boardable
MiniMax M2.5OnBoard alternatives: AppDeck, BoardEffect, BoardMaps, BoardPro

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda
Gemini 3.5 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Azeus Convene, Govenda
Mistral SmallNasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards
Llama 4 MaverickOnBoard
GPT-6 LunaOnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard, Zeck alternatives: AppDeck

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BoardPro leads by forty points.
BoardPro57%#1 of 9
Boardable17%#2 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BoardPro leads by nine points.
BoardPro20%#2 of 12
Boardable11%#3 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
BoardPro leads by two points.
BoardPro4%#5 of 9
Boardable2%#7 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BoardPro

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“BoardPro - 30% negative rate (labeled "criticized challenger") - This product has the highest negative rating among the reviewed options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“If you need seamless Outlook synchronization and strict MFA enforcement, scrutinize BoardPro.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, BoardPro is a strong choice due to its balance of affordability, ease of use, and comprehensive features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with a demo of Decisions and BoardPro, as they represent the sweet spot for most mid-sized B2B companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“BoardPro if you want the best value with transparent pricing and a solution designed specifically for growing organizations” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Boardable

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“60% negative rate in AI analysis; criticized challenger status” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“SMB-focused tools (like Boardable) may lack the governance features, integrations, or compliance standards needed by mid-market B2B leadership” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Boardable requires 30 days’ notice of cancellation before your subscription runs out, so be wary.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best board portal for a company with a limited budget is Boardable, which costs $20.99-$35.99 per user per month.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.