November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Finance › Accounting and close › ERP systems · November 2026 Edition

ERP systems

Asked as “ERP system”, and as “enterprise resource planning software for finance”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Clear leader
41Oracle NetSuite22Odoo13ERPNext24others

41% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 39% → 41%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Oracle NetSuite held the lead, +2 points on 39%, inside the 10-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Oracle NetSuite41%15%62endorsed leader▲+2Since October 2026: 39% → 41%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.39% → 41%
02Odoo22%3%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 22% → 22%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.22% → 22%
03Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central13%7%46accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 4% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 13%
04ERPNext13%0%15accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.16% → 13%
05Acumatica4%2%49accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
06Sage Intacct4%6%33accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 4%
07SAP Business One2%5%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Oracle0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14SAP S/4HANA0%40%42criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP0%28%18criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11Infor CloudSuite0%24%29accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Microsoft Dynamics 3650%12%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
08Epicor Kinetic0%7%29accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Workday Financial Management0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12IFS Cloud0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
M09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Oracle NetSuite41%
02Odoo22%
03Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central13%
04ERPNext13%
05Acumatica4%
06Sage Intacct4%
07SAP Business One2%
08Epicor Kinetic0%
09Microsoft Dynamics 3650%
10Workday Financial Management0%
11Infor CloudSuite0%
12IFS Cloud0%
13Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP0%
14SAP S/4HANA0%
15Oracle0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP S/4HANA
40%
17 of 42 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“SAP ECC / on-premise SAP S/4HANA for small/mid-size firms without deep IT resources. High licensing, customization and change-management cost, long upgrade cycles” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Oracle NetSuite
15%
9 of 62 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid high-end options like NetSuite (~$999/month base + users)” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Infor CloudSuite
24%
7 of 29 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“older on-premises versions (Lawson, Baan, legacy MAPICS) are in sunset/maintenance mode with shrinking pools of qualified developers” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Oracle
70%
7 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Large, complex systems like SAP and Oracle are known for difficult, expensive implementations that require significant IT expertise” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

69 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 684 links across 234 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 17 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

45 answers · 93 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Capterra15 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · NetSuite14 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
9 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Cin78 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
8 answers · 10 citations · 5 models
8 answers · 8 citations · 6 models
8 answers · 8 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best erp system”, “erp system”, “erp systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Oracle parent site
Oracle NetSuite 41%
41%542450,00066,611
Odoo odoo.com22%12249,5003,053406,262$64495
Microsoft Dynamics microsoft.com
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central 13%
13%1402,90050145,358,109 company$12,455103
ERPNext erpnext.com13%425,4001281,862
Acumatica acumatica.com4%14212,100242130,487$2,934120
Sage sage.com
Sage Intacct 4%
4%500246,00090,5991,737,127 company$114,67178
SAP S/4HANA sap.com
SAP Business One 2%, SAP S/4HANA 0%
2%1602,4002602,214,514$1,251232
Zoho parent site
Zoho One 2%
2%2018,100178
Epicor Kinetic epicor.com0%411,3003949,61675
Microsoft Dynamics 3650%12,100604

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best erp system” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best ERP system for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which enterprise resource planning software for finance would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top ERP systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ERP system for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a ERP system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ERP systems should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralChanged
Two alternativesOracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
no first choiceOdoo
Four alternativesCetec ERP, Cin7, ERPNext, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
no first choiceagainst: Oracle, SAP S/4HANA
GPT-5.4 miniOracle NetSuite
Six alternativesEpicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition, Workday Financial Management
Oracle NetSuiteHeld
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA
no first choiceERPNext, Odoo
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Zoho One
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashOracle NetSuite
Four alternativesAcumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA
Sage IntacctChanged
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial Management
no first choice
Eight alternativesAcumatica, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Odoo, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial Management
ERPNext
Four alternativesDolibarr, MRPeasy, Odoo, Zoho One
against: Oracle NetSuite, SAP Business One
no first choiceagainst: QuickBooksagainst: Baan, Infor CloudSuite, Lawson, Legacy Microsoft Dynamics NAV / AX, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ECC, SAP S/4HANA
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Three alternativesAcumatica, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
against: Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, SAP S/4HANA
Oracle NetSuiteChanged
Three alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
against: SAP S/4HANA
no first choiceOdoo
Three alternativesERPNext, MRPeasy, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
against: QuickBooks plus add-ons
no first choiceagainst: Acumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Odoo, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Sage Intacct
Grok 4.20Oracle NetSuite
Four alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP Business One, Sage Intacct
Oracle NetSuiteHeld
Three alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
Oracle, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternativesEpicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage
ERPNext, Odoo
Two alternativesTallyPrime, Zoho One
against: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Sage Intacct
no first choiceagainst: SAP S/4HANAagainst: Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle, SAP S/4HANA, Sage, Vista by Viewpoint
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite
Three alternativesAcumatica, SAP Business One, Sage Intacct
Oracle NetSuiteChanged
Three alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
no first choice
Six alternativesInfor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Sage
Odoo
Three alternativesAcumatica, ERPNext, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
no first choiceagainst: Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA
DeepSeek V4 FlashOracle NetSuite
Four alternativesAcumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
Oracle NetSuiteHeld
Four alternativesAcumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
no first choiceERPNext, Odoo
Four alternativesDolibarr, QuickBooks, Zoho Books, Zoho One
Oracle NetSuite
Five alternativesAcumatica, Epicor Kinetic, IFS Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage Intacct
against: Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, abas ERP
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Business OneChangedno first choiceOdoo
Three alternativesAcumatica, ERPNext, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
no first choiceagainst: Infor CloudSuite, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Dynamics
Qwen 3.7 FlashAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Four alternativesEpicor Kinetic, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Sage X3
Oracle NetSuiteChanged
Three alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP Business One
SAP S/4HANA
Four alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite
Odoo
Three alternativesAcumatica, ERPNext, Zoho Books
against: Oracle, SAP S/4HANA
Oracle NetSuite
Four alternativesAcumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365
against: Oracle Siebel, QuickBooks, SAP S/4HANA
against: Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle NetSuite, Oracle PeopleSoft, SAP S/4HANA
Kimi K2Oracle NetSuite
Four alternativesAcumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
Oracle NetSuiteHeld
Three alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP Business One
SAP S/4HANA
Six alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Odoo, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
ERPNext
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Odoo
against: Oracle NetSuite
no first choice
Three alternativesAcumatica, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
against: Oracle, SAP S/4HANA
against: Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle, SAP S/4HANA, Sage
GLM 4.7 FlashXOracle NetSuite
Four alternativesAcumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP Business One
Oracle NetSuiteHeld
Three alternativesAcumatica, SAP Business One, Sage Intacct
no first choice
Eight alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Odoo, Oracle, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial Management
ERPNext, Odoo
Six alternativesBitrix24, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Business One, Sage 50cloud, Zoho One
no first choiceagainst: AS400 systems, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite
Three alternativesAcumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Sage Intacct
Sage IntacctChanged
Three alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite
no first choiceOdoo, Zoho One
Four alternativesAcumatica, ERPNext, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
no first choiceagainst: Oracle, Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP Business Suite, SAP S/4HANA
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Two alternativesAcumatica, Oracle NetSuite
Oracle NetSuiteChanged
Three alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
no first choiceOdoo
One alternativeERPNext
no first choiceagainst: Dynamics AX 2012 R3, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, SAP ERP
Muse Glimmer 30BOracle NetSuite
Four alternativesAcumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP Business One, Sage Intacct
Oracle NetSuiteHeld
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct
no first choice
Nine alternativesInfor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Odoo, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Business One, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial Management
ERPNext, Odoo
Two alternativesMRPeasy, Zoho One
no first choiceagainst: Oracle, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:27no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:32yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:50yes819 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:44yes107 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:10yes532 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:42yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:43yes2021 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:05yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:21no028 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:22yes552 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:32yes1558 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:27yes557 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:57yes313 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:26yes1319 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:20yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:21yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:08no012 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:35yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes528 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:54yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:31yes2132 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:45yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:41yes517 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:51yes1033 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:31yes2042 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:59yes1052 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:41yes413 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:56yes1319 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:28yes109 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:44yes36 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:16no016 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:03yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:13yes1038 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:27yes1011 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:03yes2025 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:26yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:31no029 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:23yes1574 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:30yes10337 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:21yes1030 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:42yes828 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:50yes1418 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:40yes109 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:28no03 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:55no016 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:53yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:08yes528 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:35yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:33yes1923 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:58yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:27yes536 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:38yes1043 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:48no074 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:02yes1073 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:11yes219 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:02yes1517 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:01no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:28no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:53no016 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:18yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:04yes1020 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:05no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:45yes1843 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:44yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:52no028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:30yes1943 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:25yes2358 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:40yes530 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:30yes212 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:09yes1425 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:42no04 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:54yes35 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:22yes620 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:19yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:09yes531 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:00yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:27yes2229 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:06yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:56yes1564 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:23yes2436 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:40yes2596 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:42no016 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:37yes415 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:20yes1420 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica Cloud ERP read as Acumatica
Dynamics 365 Business Central read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Epicor read as Epicor Kinetic
Epicor (Kinetic or Prophet 21) read as Epicor Kinetic
Infor read as Infor CloudSuite
Infor (various modules like Infor CloudSuite) read as Infor CloudSuite
Microsoft Dynamics read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
Microsoft Dynamics (GP, AX, or older versions; even Business Central has mixed feedback) read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (Lite Edition) read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (Oracle) read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite ERP read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud ERP read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle EBS read as Oracle E-Business Suite
Oracle ERP read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP (especially Oracle Cloud / Fusion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP Cloud (Fusion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
SAP read as SAP S/4HANA
SAP (ECC 6.0) read as SAP S/4HANA
SAP (S/4HANA & Business One) read as SAP S/4HANA
SAP (including S/4HANA, ECC, and Business One) read as SAP S/4HANA
SAP (including SAP S/4HANA and SAP Business One) read as SAP S/4HANA
SAP Cloud ERP read as SAP S/4HANA
Workday read as Workday Financial Management
Unresolved, counted raw
AS400 systems
Dynamics AX 2012 R3
Legacy Microsoft Dynamics NAV / AX
Microsoft Dynamics NAV
Newer Dynamics 365 Business Central
QuickBooks plus add-ons
SAP Business Suite
SAP Dynamics
Tally ERP
Vista by Viewpoint
abas ERP
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Crypto accountingFinancial close manageme →