SoftLedger vs CoinLedger
One of fourteen models named SoftLedger first on the direct prompt; zero named CoinLedger. SoftLedger was named by eleven of the fourteen models and CoinLedger by thirteen and SoftLedger carries 18 labels and CoinLedger 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the crypto accounting page.
By framing
SoftLedgerFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCoinLedger
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, SoftLedger and CoinLedger were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 72 answers naming SoftLedger and the 74 naming CoinLedger. In those answers CoinLedger took the first choice three times and SoftLedger zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
SoftLedger CoinLedger first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SoftLedger on the left and CoinLedger on the right.The direct prompt
SoftLedger first, CoinLedger not the choice
1 of 14 modelsCoinLedger was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
CoinLedger3%#8 of 12SoftLedger2%#10 of 12SoftLedger4%#6 of 13CoinLedger2%#7 of 13SoftLedger4%#3 of 11CoinLedger0%#10 of 11What the models said about SoftLedger
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“What to Avoid ... SoftLedger ($749/mo) ... overkill for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“For a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd suggest starting with SoftLedger” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“SoftLedger ⭐ Best Overall for Mid-Market” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“SoftLedger takes a fundamentally different approach: it *is* the accounting system, designed for crypto-native companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about CoinLedger
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Accuracy & Support Issues ... Users report significant calculation errors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“In late 2025, CoinLedger experienced a security incident involving one of its analytics vendors (Mixpanel).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“may work for individual tax reporting, but they generally are not substitutes for a business general ledger” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with CoinLedger if you want a truly free plan with live chat, CPA-ready exports, and strong audit support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“CoinLedger ⭐ Best Overall Value ... Start with CoinLedger's free plan” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Similar to Koinly; unlimited plans ~$199–$299. Good for high-volume but pay-per-report model keeps it cheap initially.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.