Eight of fourteen models named Cryptoworth first on the direct prompt; zero named CoinLedger. Cryptoworth was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and CoinLedger by thirteen and Cryptoworth carries 46 labels and CoinLedger 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the crypto accounting page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Cryptoworth and CoinLedger were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 130 answers naming Cryptoworth and the 74 naming CoinLedger. In those answers CoinLedger took the first choice four times and Cryptoworth zero.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“multiple hard negative reviews citing issues with reliability and speed” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“paid plans reportedly begin around $285/month, making it better for a growing business than a very small operation” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Most enterprise vendors—including Bitwave, Cryptio, Cryptoworth, and others—use custom pricing” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cryptoworth sits comfortably in the mid-market: more accessible than Bitwave, more accounting-complete than a tax app, and is suitable for mid-market companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Cryptoworth offers the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need a purpose-built mid-market solution with strong GL sync and multi-entity support: Cryptoworth.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Accuracy & Support Issues ... Users report significant calculation errors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“In late 2025, CoinLedger experienced a security incident involving one of its analytics vendors (Mixpanel).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“may work for individual tax reporting, but they generally are not substitutes for a business general ledger” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with CoinLedger if you want a truly free plan with live chat, CPA-ready exports, and strong audit support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“CoinLedger ⭐ Best Overall Value ... Start with CoinLedger's free plan” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Similar to Koinly; unlimited plans ~$199–$299. Good for high-volume but pay-per-report model keeps it cheap initially.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.