Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Crypto accounting › Cryptoworth vs CoinLedger
Crypto accounting · November 2026 Edition

Cryptoworth vs CoinLedger

Eight of fourteen models named Cryptoworth first on the direct prompt; zero named CoinLedger. Cryptoworth was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and CoinLedger by thirteen and Cryptoworth carries 46 labels and CoinLedger 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Cryptoworth

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

CoinLedger

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share25%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4629A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cryptoworth reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Bitwave was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Bitwave vs Cryptoworth · Bitwave vs CoinLedger · Cryptoworth vs Breezing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the crypto accounting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CryptoworthFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCoinLedger
Direct80
Paraphrase40
Comparative01
Budget-constrained012 against Cryptoworth
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Cryptoworth · 5 against CoinLedger
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Cryptoworth and CoinLedger were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 130 answers naming Cryptoworth and the 74 naming CoinLedger. In those answers CoinLedger took the first choice four times and Cryptoworth zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cryptoworth and CoinLedger stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Cryptoworth CoinLedger first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cryptoworth on the left and CoinLedger on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cryptoworth and CoinLedger stood in it.

Cryptoworth first, CoinLedger not the choice

8 of 14 modelsCoinLedger was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cryptoworth alternatives: Bitwave, Breezing, Sage Intacct, SoftLedger
GPT-5.4 miniCryptoworth alternatives: Bitwave, Cryptio, SoftLedger
Perplexity SonarCryptoworth alternatives: Bitwave, Ledgible, TRES Finance
DeepSeek V4 FlashCryptoworth alternatives: Bitwave, Cryptio, Ledgible
Llama 4 MaverickCryptoworth alternatives: Bitwave, Cryptio
GLM 4.7 FlashXCryptoworth alternatives: Bitwave, Breezing, Cryptio, Ledgible
MiniMax M2.5Cryptoworth alternatives: Bitwave, Breezing, Cryptio
Muse Glimmer 30BCryptoworth alternatives: Bitwave, Cryptio

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashBitwave alternatives: Cryptio, Cryptoworth, TRES Finance
Grok 4.20Bitwave alternatives: Cryptio, Cryptoworth, SoftLedger
Mistral SmallBitwave, Cryptio alternatives: Cryptoworth
Kimi K2SoftLedger alternatives: Bitwave, Cryptoworth

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Qwen 3.7 FlashBitwave alternatives: Cryptio, TRES Finance
GPT-6 LunaBitwave alternatives: Cryptio

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cryptoworth leads by two points.
Cryptoworth5%#6 of 12
CoinLedger3%#8 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Cryptoworth leads by twenty-three points.
Cryptoworth25%#2 of 13
CoinLedger2%#7 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Cryptoworth leads by two points.
Cryptoworth2%#4 of 11
CoinLedger0%#10 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Cryptoworth

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“multiple hard negative reviews citing issues with reliability and speed” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“paid plans reportedly begin around $285/month, making it better for a growing business than a very small operation” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Most enterprise vendors—including Bitwave, Cryptio, Cryptoworth, and others—use custom pricing” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cryptoworth sits comfortably in the mid-market: more accessible than Bitwave, more accounting-complete than a tax app, and is suitable for mid-market companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Cryptoworth offers the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need a purpose-built mid-market solution with strong GL sync and multi-entity support: Cryptoworth.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about CoinLedger

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Accuracy & Support Issues ... Users report significant calculation errors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“In late 2025, CoinLedger experienced a security incident involving one of its analytics vendors (Mixpanel).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“may work for individual tax reporting, but they generally are not substitutes for a business general ledger” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with CoinLedger if you want a truly free plan with live chat, CPA-ready exports, and strong audit support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“CoinLedger ⭐ Best Overall Value ... Start with CoinLedger's free plan” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Similar to Koinly; unlimited plans ~$199–$299. Good for high-volume but pay-per-report model keeps it cheap initially.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.