Eight of fourteen models named Cryptoworth first on the direct prompt; one named SoftLedger. Cryptoworth was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and SoftLedger by eleven and Cryptoworth carries 46 labels and SoftLedger 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the crypto accounting page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Cryptoworth and SoftLedger were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 130 answers naming Cryptoworth and the 72 naming SoftLedger. In those answers SoftLedger took the first choice two times and Cryptoworth nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“multiple hard negative reviews citing issues with reliability and speed” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“paid plans reportedly begin around $285/month, making it better for a growing business than a very small operation” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Most enterprise vendors—including Bitwave, Cryptio, Cryptoworth, and others—use custom pricing” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cryptoworth sits comfortably in the mid-market: more accessible than Bitwave, more accounting-complete than a tax app, and is suitable for mid-market companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Cryptoworth offers the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need a purpose-built mid-market solution with strong GL sync and multi-entity support: Cryptoworth.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“What to Avoid ... SoftLedger ($749/mo) ... overkill for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“For a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd suggest starting with SoftLedger” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“SoftLedger ⭐ Best Overall for Mid-Market” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“SoftLedger takes a fundamentally different approach: it *is* the accounting system, designed for crypto-native companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.