Eight of fourteen models named Cryptoworth first on the direct prompt; one named Cryptio. Cryptoworth was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Cryptio by fourteen and Cryptoworth carries 46 labels and Cryptio 52, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the crypto accounting page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Cryptoworth and Cryptio were named in the same answer 105 times, of the 130 answers naming Cryptoworth and the 175 naming Cryptio. In those answers Cryptio took the first choice twenty-five times and Cryptoworth twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“multiple hard negative reviews citing issues with reliability and speed” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“paid plans reportedly begin around $285/month, making it better for a growing business than a very small operation” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Most enterprise vendors—including Bitwave, Cryptio, Cryptoworth, and others—use custom pricing” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cryptoworth sits comfortably in the mid-market: more accessible than Bitwave, more accounting-complete than a tax app, and is suitable for mid-market companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Cryptoworth offers the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need a purpose-built mid-market solution with strong GL sync and multi-entity support: Cryptoworth.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid ... Cryptio ($449+/mo) ... overkill for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools such as Bitwave, Cryptio, and TRES” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Best suited to enterprise controls, multi-entity accounting, and high-volume reconciliation rather than a typical mid-market deployment.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · soft negative
“Cryptio and Bitwave are the leading choices due to their enterprise-grade features and integrations.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Cryptio is strongest for enterprise controls, multi-entity operations, and high-volume reconciliation” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“the most commonly recommended digital asset subledgers are Bitwave and Cryptio” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.