Smarsh Enterprise Archive is a communications archiving product used for regulatory compliance · smarsh.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Google Vault is first at 20%.
Tied for first with Microsoft Purview. 6 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Proofpoint Enterprise Archive at 18%.
“Best overall for large-scale communications archiving, for organizations needing capture across 100-plus channels with mature surveillance and discovery workflows.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“Exceptional breadth of channel capture... Financial institutions facing SEC/FINRA scrutiny generally lean toward Global Relay, Smarsh, or Shield”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Smarsh is well-suited for regulated enterprises and growing mid-market firms that need supervision across multiple communication channels”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Smarsh is widely considered the leader for organizations that need the broadest capture capabilities across legacy and modern channels.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Smarsh Enterprise Archive and Proofpoint Enterprise Archive are considered "criticized challengers" due to their complex pricing, unavailability of functions, slow search”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Avoid or be truly cautious about: Global Relay (if you're not a large enterprise), Veritas Enterprise Vault (if you're not already locked in), and Smarsh”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“heavily criticized for complex and vague pricing, slow search performance... Many models and user reviews consider these issues as deal breakers.”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“frequently criticized for complex and vague pricing structures, unavailability of key functions, and notably slow search performance”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Smarsh Enterprise Archive, over the 160 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | 1 | View → | |
| 95 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 93 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 73 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 54 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 49 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 0 | View → | |
| 41 | 0 | View → | |
| 36 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 33 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Smarsh Enterprise Archive →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Smarsh Enterprise Archive's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 146 of the 160 answers that named Smarsh Enterprise Archive and are not a share of its labels.
342 of the 471 domain citations in answers naming Smarsh Enterprise Archive came from a third party's page. Forty-nine were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 834 | 14 | 2026-09-28 | TPRM | |
| Report or ebook | 190 | undated | |||
| News or press | 162 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 98 | 0 | 2020-07-01 | TPRM | |
| Podcast or video | 64 | 0 | 2022-12-20 | ||
| Case study | 25 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 22 | 0 | 2025-11-20 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2026-01-28 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated |
Every page smarsh.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.