Pentaho Data Integration
Named, too few times to rank.
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Pentaho Data Integration has 8.
Why models recommend it
“Airbyte Core self-hosted or Pentaho Data Integration are the most commonly recommended starting points”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Talend Open Studio or Pentaho might be better options”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Best for Simple Needs: Pentaho Data Integration (PDI)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Cost: FREE community edition”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Solid traditional ETL option, often used on a budget, though the UI and experience feel older.”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Tools like Talend and Pentaho ... have shifted toward expensive enterprise licenses.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Negative question · warning
“Pentaho comes with drawbacks including a limited set of templates and technical issues”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Pentaho Data Integration, over the 20 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 9 | View → | |
| 14 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 2 | View → | |
| 9 | 1 | View → | |
| 8 | 1 | View → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 2 | View → | |
| 5 | 1 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 14 of the 20 answers that named Pentaho Data Integration and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Pentaho Data Integration came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |