Microsoft Security Copilot is a generative AI assistant for cybersecurity and security operations teams, rather than general IT helpdesk work · microsoft.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Dropzone AI is first at 33%.
Dropzone AI is first at 35%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Dropzone AI is first at 31%.
“Choose Microsoft Security Copilot if your organization is already heavily invested in Microsoft 365, Azure, and Sentinel.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · first choice
“I recommend Microsoft Security Copilot or Dropzone AI as your AI SOC analyst for alert triage”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“if you need AI to do security faster, look at Microsoft Security Copilot, Cisco, CrowdStrike”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“Companies already standardized on Defender, Sentinel, Entra, and Microsoft 365 | Less compelling if your environment is vendor-diverse”Perplexity Sonar · Paraphrase question · alternative
“enterprise AI SOC solutions like Microsoft Security Copilot, ReliaQuest GreyMatter, or CrowdStrike Charlotte AI are often cost-prohibitive”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Microsoft Security Copilot — noted as having "several components still in preview" (feels incomplete in production)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Limited effectiveness outside of Microsoft-native telemetry; currently more of a "chatbot" than a true agent.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · warning
“it is also noted that it can be expensive, with licensing costs starting at around $4,000-$6,000 per month”Llama 4 Maverick · Budget-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Security Copilot, over the 112 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | 32 | Compare → | |
| 65 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 56 | 2 | View → | |
| 47 | 2 | View → | |
| 44 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 1 | View → | |
| 25 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 22 | 3 | View → | |
| 17 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 3 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Microsoft Security Copilot →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Microsoft Security Copilot's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 111 of the 112 answers that named Microsoft Security Copilot and are not a share of its labels.
338 of the 374 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Security Copilot came from a third party's page. Thirty-six were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |