Zero of fourteen models named Microsoft Security Copilot first on the direct prompt; one named Radiant Security. Microsoft Security Copilot was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Radiant Security by ten and Microsoft Security Copilot carries 30 labels and Radiant Security 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SOC agents page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Microsoft Security Copilot and Radiant Security were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 112 answers naming Microsoft Security Copilot and the 36 naming Radiant Security. In those answers Radiant Security took the first choice zero times and Microsoft Security Copilot zero.
| Model | DirectMS | ParaphraseMS | ComparativeMS | Budget-constrainedMS | Scale-constrainedMS | NegativeMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | MS | MS | MS | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | MS | MS | MS | MS | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | MS | MS | MS | MS | ||
| Grok 4.20 | MS | MS | ||||
| Mistral Small | MS | MS | MS | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | MS | MS | MS | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | MS | MS | ||||
| Kimi K2 | MS | MS | MS | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | MS | MS | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | MS | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | MS | MS |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“enterprise AI SOC solutions like Microsoft Security Copilot, ReliaQuest GreyMatter, or CrowdStrike Charlotte AI are often cost-prohibitive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Security Copilot — noted as having "several components still in preview" (feels incomplete in production)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited effectiveness outside of Microsoft-native telemetry; currently more of a "chatbot" than a true agent.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“I recommend Microsoft Security Copilot or Dropzone AI as your AI SOC analyst for alert triage” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Companies already standardized on Defender, Sentinel, Entra, and Microsoft 365 | Less compelling if your environment is vendor-diverse” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Older or acquired players (e.g., Radiant Security's tech now under Cribl) have faded as standalone options.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“It's the most purpose-built AI SOC platform for the mid-market on this list” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“starts at approximately $1,188/year with flat-rate pricing for growing teams, making it one of the most affordable options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
“agentic triage that integrates with existing SIEM/EDR, designed for augmentation without rip-and-replace” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.