LayerX is a browser-native security product for enterprises, delivered as a lightweight, agentless browser extension · layerxsecurity.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Edge for Business is first at 31%.
Microsoft Edge for Business is first at 39%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Chrome Enterprise is first at 38%.
“I'd generally recommend LayerX if your priority is browser-layer protection across both managed and unmanaged devices”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · first choice
“buy an enterprise browser extension (cheaper, faster) ... Get demos from Island, Prisma Access Browser, LayerX, and Chrome Enterprise Premium”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scale-constrained question · alternative
“Look at LayerX or Harmony Browse if you want to strengthen browser security without asking everyone to adopt a new browser.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · alternative
“evaluate whether an extension-based approach (like LayerX) or a browser security platform might be less disruptive”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · alternative
“Lighter weight, but they can't enforce the same deep controls as dedicated browsers on unmanaged devices. Less ideal for your use case.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
“Paid secure browsers (e.g., Prisma Access, LayerX) ... are overkill and expensive for budget-conscious teams.”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“they may add more complexity/cost than mid-market teams want unless you're dealing with extreme risks”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
“Avoid: Unverified "Enterprise Security" Browser Extensions ... (e.g., LayerX, Push Security)”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as LayerX, over the 56 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | 19 | Compare → | |
| 48 | 17 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 18 | Compare → | |
| 20 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 1 | View → | |
| 16 | 1 | View → | |
| 16 | 1 | View → | |
| 14 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 7 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of LayerX →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on LayerX's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 54 of the 56 answers that named LayerX and are not a share of its labels.
197 of the 197 domain citations in answers naming LayerX came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,411 | 0 | 2026-06-29 | Microsegmentation, CDN | |
| Glossary or explainer | 519 | 0 | 2026-06-15 | MFA, DLP | |
| News or press | 363 | 0 | 2026-07-05 | Microsegmentation, CDN | |
| Case study | 307 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 197 | 0 | 2026-05-26 | Microsegmentation, WAF | |
| Podcast or video | 93 | undated | SASE, Load balancers | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 42 | undated | Microsegmentation | ||
| Conference or event | 40 | 0 | 2026-03-15 | ||
| Comparison | 36 | 0 | 2026-03-25 | API gateways, Enterprise browsers | |
| Template or tool | 14 | undated | Client-side protection, WAF |
Every page layerxsecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name microsegmentation (37); 10 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.