Illumio Segmentation is a microsegmentation platform from Illumio that applies workload-centric segmentation across hybrid cloud environments · illumio.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Zero Networks Segment is first at 30%.
ColorTokens Xshield is first at 36%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Zero Networks Segment at 11%.
“Best dedicated enterprise platform: Illumio is a strong default when the priority is workload-centric segmentation across heterogeneous hybrid environments.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
“PeerSpot ranks Illumio Segmentation as the top rated solution in 2026 with the largest mind share, 9.0 rating and 21.9% mind share.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“A pioneer in microsegmentation... Illumio and Guardicore are leaders, with Illumio offering more mature policy engines”Mistral Small · Comparative question · first choice
“the safest "best overall" microsegmentation choice is usually Illumio or Akamai Guardicore Segmentation”GPT-5.4 mini · Direct question · first choice
“Avoid Enterprise Giants (like Illumio or Tufin) unless you have the scale”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Cons reported are: requires tuning in high-throughput environments; PCE can experience slowness at very large scale... Agent overhead and deployment time is a common friction.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“even the well-known players like Illumio face criticism primarily around a steep learning curve, not necessarily abandonment-level problems”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Instead of paying high six-figure annual licenses for enterprise microsegmentation suites like Illumio or Akamai Guardicore”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Illumio Segmentation, over the 184 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 148 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 96 | 0 | View → | |
| 93 | 31 | Compare → | |
| 85 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 75 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 70 | 2 | View → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 0 | View → | |
| 17 | 3 | View → | |
| 17 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Illumio Segmentation →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Illumio Segmentation's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 165 of the 184 answers that named Illumio Segmentation and are not a share of its labels.
486 of the 610 domain citations in answers naming Illumio Segmentation came from a third party's page. Sixty-six were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 839 | 15 | 2026-10-01 | Microsegmentation, EDR | |
| News or press | 756 | 79 | 2026-10-02 | Microsegmentation, ZTNA | |
| Conference or event | 58 | 2 | 2026-10-06 | ||
| Podcast or video | 57 | 31 | 2026-09-30 | ||
| Case study | 52 | 29 | 2026-10-02 | Microsegmentation | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ZTNA, Microsegmentation | |
| Comparison | 19 | 3 | 2026-09-15 | NDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | Microsegmentation | |
| Report or ebook | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-09 |
As the event pages on illumio.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page illumio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.