Microsegmentation · November 2026 Edition
Zero Networks Segment vs Illumio Segmentation
One of fourteen models named Zero Networks Segment first on the direct prompt; two named Illumio Segmentation. Zero Networks Segment was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Illumio Segmentation by fourteen and Zero Networks Segment carries 33 labels and Illumio Segmentation 56, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share16%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels3356A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Zero Networks Segment reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ColorTokens Xshield was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. ColorTokens Xshield vs Zero Networks Segment · ColorTokens Xshield vs Illumio Segmentation · Zero Networks Segment vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the microsegmentation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Zero Networks SegmentFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIllumio Segmentation
Direct121 against Zero Networks Segment · 3 against Illumio Segmentation
Paraphrase32
Comparative011
Budget-constrained304 against Illumio Segmentation
Scale-constrained01
Negative103 against Illumio Segmentation
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Zero Networks Segment and Illumio Segmentation were named in the same answer ninety-three times, of the 100 answers naming Zero Networks Segment and the 184 naming Illumio Segmentation. In those answers Illumio Segmentation took the first choice thirty-two times and Zero Networks Segment thirty-one.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Zero Networks Segment and Illumio Segmentation stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Zero Networks Segment Illumio Segmentation first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zero Networks Segment on the left and Illumio Segmentation on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Zero Networks Segment and Illumio Segmentation stood in it.
Zero Networks Segment first, Illumio Segmentation not the choice
1 of 14 modelsIllumio Segmentation was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Kimi K2Zero Networks Segment alternatives: ColorTokens Xshield
Illumio Segmentation first, Zero Networks Segment an alternative
2 of 14 modelsZero Networks Segment was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniAkamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation alternatives: Zero Networks Segment
GPT-6 LunaIllumio Segmentation alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, ColorTokens Xshield
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashAkamai Guardicore Segmentation alternatives: Elisity, Illumio Segmentation, Isovalent/Cilium, Tigera Calico, Zero Networks Segment
Perplexity SonarColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation, Zero Networks Segment
Mistral SmallColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Zero Networks Segment
DeepSeek V4 FlashColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Illumio Segmentation
Qwen 3.7 FlashColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Illumio Segmentation, Palo Alto Networks, Tigera Calico
GLM 4.7 FlashXAkamai Guardicore Segmentation, ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Cisco Identity Services Engine, Cisco Secure Workload, Illumio Segmentation, VMware NSX
Muse Glimmer 30BColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Broadcom, Illumio Segmentation, VMware NSX, Zscaler Private Access
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Grok 4.20ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Elisity, Zero Networks Segmentation
Llama 4 MaverickColorTokens Xshield
MiniMax M2.5ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Airlock Microgateway, Faddom, Opinnate Network Security Policy Manager
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Zero Networks Segment leads by twenty-five points.
Zero Networks Segment30%#1 of 11Illumio Segmentation5%#3 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Zero Networks Segment leads by four points.
Zero Networks Segment16%#2 of 8Illumio Segmentation11%#3 of 8Enterprise
The order flips: Illumio Segmentation leads at enterprise.
Illumio Segmentation77%#1 of 8Zero Networks Segment11%#2 of 8What the models said about Zero Networks Segment
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Look at Zero Networks, but verify how its enforcement works on *your* operating systems... may not suit every asset” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · soft negative
“Zero Networks Segment is the lowest-cost agentless option that still delivers true workload-level segmentation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Zero Networks (often positioned as addressing legacy pain points with simpler, more effective approaches).” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“For most companies with a limited budget, Zero Networks is the best microsegmentation solution” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Illumio Segmentation
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid Enterprise Giants (like Illumio or Tufin) unless you have the scale” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Cons reported are: requires tuning in high-throughput environments; PCE can experience slowness at very large scale... Agent overhead and deployment time is a common friction.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“even the well-known players like Illumio face criticism primarily around a steep learning curve, not necessarily abandonment-level problems” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best dedicated enterprise platform: Illumio is a strong default when the priority is workload-centric segmentation across heterogeneous hybrid environments.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“PeerSpot ranks Illumio Segmentation as the top rated solution in 2026 with the largest mind share, 9.0 rating and 21.9% mind share.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“A pioneer in microsegmentation... Illumio and Guardicore are leaders, with Illumio offering more mature policy engines” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
ColorTokens Xshield vs Zero Networks SegmentColorTokens Xshield vs Illumio SegmentationZero Networks Segment vs Akamai Guardicore SegmentationZero Networks Segment vs Cisco Secure WorkloadIllumio Segmentation vs Akamai Guardicore SegmentationIllumio Segmentation vs Cisco Secure WorkloadAll ten head-to-head pages and the full microsegmentation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.