One category · what the models named insteadAlternatives to GitHub, as AI models named them
In the November 2026 Edition, 66 of the 252 answers collected in the one category where GitHub holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
Source control hosting
Seventeen of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub; it was the first choice in sixty-six. The first choices in those seventeen answers, two products in all:
Twenty-five of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub; it was the first choice in fifty-two. The first choices in those twenty-five answers, two products in all:
Twenty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub; it was the first choice in fifty-one. The first choices in those twenty-four answers, five products in all:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled GitHub neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named GitHub only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from GitHub's side.
The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of GitHub was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.