Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Products › EY · November 2026 Edition

Penetration testing as a service · Named, not ranked

EY

EY provides consulting, assurance, tax and transaction services to its clients

–Too few to rank

4/14Models named it

0First choices

3Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inPenetration testing as a service #113 mid-market

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. EY has 1.

Why models recommend it

No positive label carried a quote.

What gives them pause

“reviewing a penetration testing report from EY which seemed more like an enhanced vulnerability scan rather than a genuine penetration test”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as EY, over the 4 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
Deloitte	3	0	View →
PwC	3	0	View →
Cobalt	2	1	View →
NetSPI	2	1	View →
Bishop Fox	2	0	View →
KPMG	2	0	View →
Mandiant	2	0	View →
NCC Group	2	0	View →
Rapid7	2	0	View →
Synack	2	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named EY came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named EY and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

deepstrike.io2

netragard.com2

reddit.com2

stingrai.io2

7asecurity.com1

andersenlab.com1

atlantsecurity.com1

brightdefense.com1

bugcrowd.com1

ciopages.com1

No domain is on file for EY, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

deepstrike.io/blog/penetration-testing-company-red-flags2

netragard.com/blog/5-things-look-for-penetration-testing-company2

reddit.com/r/Pentesting/comments/1krk867/any_cybersecurity_companies_to_avoid_when2

7asecurity.com/blog/2026/08/how-to-interview-a-penetration-testing-company1

andersenlab.com/blueprint/top-15-penetration-testing-companies1

atlantsecurity.com/blog/it-security-companies1

brightdefense.com/resources/best-vapt-companies1

bugcrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ultimate-guide-penetration-testing.pdf1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on EY across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Warning	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1