Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Products › Exchange Online Protection · November 2026 Edition

Email security · Named, not ranked

Exchange Online Protection

–Too few to rank

3/14Models named it

0First choices

2Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inEmail security #64 mid-market

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Exchange Online Protection has 1.

Why models recommend it

No positive label carried a quote.

What gives them pause

“convenient but often insufficient alone against sophisticated threats”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Exchange Online Protection, over the 3 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
Abnormal AI	3	0	View →
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration	3	0	View →
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	3	0	View →
Mimecast Email Security	2	1	View →
Barracuda Email Protection	2	0	View →
Google Workspace	2	0	View →
Proofpoint Email Protection	2	0	View →
Acronis Cyber Protect	1	0	View →
Appriver	1	0	View →
Bitdefender Email Security	1	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Exchange Online Protection came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Exchange Online Protection and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

barracuda.com2

peerspot.com2

reddit.com2

abnormal.ai1

allaboutcookies.org1

assets.barracuda.com1

at-bay.com1

blog.knowbe4.com1

capterra.com1

checkpoint.com1

No domain is on file for Exchange Online Protection, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

abnormal.ai/glossary/integrated-cloud-email-security1

allaboutcookies.org/worst-email-providers1

assets.barracuda.com/assets/docs/dms/2023-spear-phishing-trends.pdf1

at-bay.com/2024-insursec-rankings-report1

at-bay.com/articles/email-security-research-report-top-insights1

at-bay.com/press_releases/2024-insursec-rankings-report1

at-bay.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/At-Bay-Report-Ranking-Email-Security-Solutions.pdf1

barracuda.com/1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Exchange Online Protection across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Warning	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0