Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Products › Appriver · November 2026 Edition

Email security · Named, not ranked

Appriver

–Too few to rank

2/14Models named it

0First choices

1Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inEmail security #59 mid-market

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Appriver has 1.

Why models recommend it

No positive label carried a quote.

What gives them pause

“these appear in the middle-to-lower tiers for email security effectiveness, with higher-than-average incident frequencies”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Appriver, over the 2 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	2	1	View →
Mimecast Email Security	2	1	View →
Abnormal AI	2	0	View →
Barracuda Email Protection	2	0	View →
Proofpoint Email Protection	2	0	View →
Sophos Email	2	0	View →
Google Workspace built-in ATP	1	1	View →
AOL Mail	1	0	View →
Bitdefender Email Security	1	0	View →
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration	1	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Appriver came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Appriver and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

at-bay.com2

reddit.com2

adaptivesecurity.com1

allaboutcookies.org1

checkpoint.com1

community.spiceworks.com1

defendmybusiness.com1

email-comparison.as93.net1

g2.com1

gane.ai/indexpublisher (Gane)1

No domain is on file for Appriver, so its own site is not marked. One was to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.

Pages cited

at-bay.com/press_releases/2024-insursec-rankings-report2

reddit.com/r/msp/comments/1uvgv94/email_security_solutions2

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/email-security-for-small-businesses-the-complete-guide1

allaboutcookies.org/worst-email-providers1

at-bay.com/2024-insursec-rankings-report1

at-bay.com/articles/email-security-research-report-top-insights1

at-bay.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/At-Bay-Report-Ranking-Email-Security-Solutions.pdf1

checkpoint.com/comparison/best-email-security-companies1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Appriver across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Warning	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0