dope.security
Strongest at mid-market. Not named at small business or enterprise.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
No model named it for this buyer.
Credo AI is first at 19%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
No model named it for this buyer.
Why models recommend it
“dope.security is built for that gap: it discovers every AI app in use, enforces enterprise-only accounts, and blocks sensitive data in prompts from one console.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Enforcement and shadow-AI control now - e.g. dope.security - to discover every AI app, enforce enterprise-only accounts and block sensitive data in prompts.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“The author argues the best AI governance tool for a mid-size company is "an enforcement layer that sees and controls AI use on every laptop"”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“dope.security - discovers every AI app in use, enforces enterprise-only accounts, and blocks sensitive data in prompts from one console.”Llama 4 Maverick · Paraphrase question · first choice
What gives them pause
No model argued against it.
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as dope.security, over the 24 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 7 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 6 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 6 | 1 | View → | |
| 6 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 5 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 2 | View → | |
| 3 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of dope.security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named dope.security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Fifty-seven of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming dope.security came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |