Burp Suite DAST
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
OWASP ZAP is first at 51%.
Invicti is first at 33%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Invicti is first at 58%.
Why models recommend it
“Burp Suite DAST is a top choice for automated, scheduled scanning needs while delivering robust reporting”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Consider Burp Suite DAST instead if you already have security testers who use Burp”GPT-6 Luna · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Burp Suite DAST if a central AppSec team needs to manage scans across a portfolio”GPT-6 Luna · Direct question · alternative
“better if the security team performs substantial manual penetration testing”Perplexity Sonar · Paraphrase question · alternative
What gives them pause
No model argued against it.
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Burp Suite DAST, over the 30 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 10 | View → | |
| 15 | 4 | View → | |
| 15 | 3 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 1 | View → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Burp Suite DAST and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for Burp Suite DAST, so its own site is not marked. Six were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |