Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed, serverless NoSQL database service from AWS that stores key-value and document data · aws.amazon.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
MongoDB is first at 81%.
MongoDB is first at 74%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
MongoDB is first at 53%.
“lean toward a managed, cloud-specific solution (like DynamoDB or Cosmos DB), even with the potential lock-in”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“MongoDB (as a managed service like MongoDB Atlas) or Amazon DynamoDB would be my top recommendations”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“For a key-value database service, Amazon DynamoDB is the most frequently recommended option.”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Top Key-Value Database Recommendation: Amazon DynamoDB ... is the top key-value pick”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · first choice
“AI models and experts often advise avoiding DynamoDB as a primary application database unless your use case is a perfect fit for key-value patterns.”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Avoid managed enterprise tiers (DynamoDB, Cosmos DB, etc.)”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Budget-constrained question · warning
“DynamoDB (but model your access patterns rigidly upfront)... DynamoDB's provisioned mode can be cheap or catastrophically expensive if misconfigured.”Kimi K2 · Scale-constrained question · warning
“Amazon DynamoDB if your data model is not naturally key-based or if you expect to "query anything" like a relational database.”GPT-5.4 mini · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Amazon DynamoDB, over the 208 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 197 | 119 | Compare → | |
| 123 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 119 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 96 | 3 | View → | |
| 93 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 64 | 4 | View → | |
| 63 | 0 | View → | |
| 52 | 0 | View → | |
| 46 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Amazon DynamoDB →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Amazon DynamoDB's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 154 of the 208 answers that named Amazon DynamoDB and are not a share of its labels.
276 of the 431 domain citations in answers naming Amazon DynamoDB came from a third party's page. Fifty were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 27,117 | undated | API gateways, ETL | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6,521 | undated | ETL, MFA | ||
| Case study | 2,476 | 0 | 2019-03-01 | WAF, Observability | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 2,057 | 16 | 2026-07-01 | Streaming, API gateways | |
| Comparison | 1,521 | 0 | 2025-09-01 | Object storage, ETL | |
| Conference or event | 1,482 | 0 | 2025-11-01 | Vector databases | |
| Report or ebook | 1,090 | 16 | 2026-09-01 | WAF, NoSQL | |
| Podcast or video | 351 | undated | ETL | ||
| Template or tool | 150 | 0 | 2025-05-01 | ||
| News or press | 34 | undated |
As the event pages on aws.amazon.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page aws.amazon.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ETL (168); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 28, 2026.