Threat intelligence platforms · November 2026 Edition
MISP vs Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Zero of fourteen models named MISP first on the direct prompt; two named Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud. Both were named by all fourteen models and MISP carries 48 labels and Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share21%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%33%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4855A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, MISP reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. MISP vs OpenCTI · MISP vs Anomali ThreatStream · MISP vs Rapid7 Threat Command
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the threat intelligence platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MISPFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Direct023 against Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Paraphrase201 against MISP · 4 against Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Comparative011
Budget-constrained1004 against Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Scale-constrained001 against Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Negative113 against MISP · 6 against Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, MISP and Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud were named in the same answer eighty-nine times, of the 115 answers naming MISP and the 181 naming Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud. In those answers Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud took the first choice seventeen times and MISP fifteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where MISP and Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
MISP Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, MISP on the left and Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where MISP and Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud stood in it.
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud first, MISP not the choice
2 of 14 modelsMISP was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud alternatives: GreyNoise, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFox Intelligence
Mistral SmallAnomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Cyble Vision
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashFlare, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Feedly for Cybersecurity, Microsoft MDTI, OpenCTI, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Grok 4.20Anomali ThreatStream alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, NordStellar, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud, ThreatConnect
Llama 4 MaverickCyble Vision alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, NordStellar, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Kimi K2Anomali ThreatStream alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, MISP, OpenCTI, ThreatConnect
Muse Glimmer 30BNordStellar, Rapid7 Threat Command alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, MISP, OpenCTI, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud, ThreatConnect
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Perplexity SonarThreatConnect alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard
DeepSeek V4 FlashCyble Vision, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence
Qwen 3.7 FlashRapid7 Threat Command alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, ThreatConnect
GLM 4.7 FlashXRapid7 Threat Command, ThreatConnect TI Ops alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence Platform
MiniMax M2.5Anomali ThreatStream alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, OpenCTI, Rapid7 Threat Command, ThreatConnect TI Ops
GPT-6 LunaRecorded Future Core alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, Google Threat Intelligence
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
MISP leads by nineteen points.
MISP19%#1 of 16Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud0%#16 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
MISP leads by eighteen points.
MISP21%#1 of 14Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud4%#7 of 14Enterprise
The order flips: Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud leads at enterprise.
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud62%#1 of 16MISP0%#15 of 16What the models said about MISP
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Sources such as OTX, MISP feeds, PhishTank, and similar services can be useful, but licensing, fair-use, commercial-use, freshness, and accuracy need review” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“has had authenticated SQL injection (CVE‑2026‑44381) that can be exploited by an attacker with a valid API key” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Unlike older open-source tools like MISP, OpenCTI offers a modern, graph-based user interface” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“MISP is an excellent starting point for organizations building their first threat intelligence program without the budget for commercial TIPs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Free, community-driven, and transparent about data sources. Best for organizations with internal intelligence capability.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“the best threat intelligence (TI) platform is often an open-source or free-tier option like MISP ... or OpenCTI” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“small businesses should generally avoid or be cautious about Recorded Future due to its high cost and steep learning curve” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Top-tier threat intelligence platforms (such as Recorded Future, Mandiant, or ThreatConnect) are legitimate, high-quality enterprise tools. However, they can turn into "shelfware"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Independent user reviews note Recorded Future as complex to navigate with a big learning curve, difficulty creating accurate queries and managing data, and seen inaccuracy.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Broad intelligence coverage, packaged for multiple teams... Uses AI and machine learning to provide real-time threat intelligence” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Frequently ranked 1st in 2026 buyer lists... Broad enterprise coverage and packaging for multiple teams → Recorded Future.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Forrester's 2023 Wave report highlights leaders like Recorded Future and Mandiant (now Google) for overall capability.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
MISP vs OpenCTIMISP vs Anomali ThreatStreamMISP vs Rapid7 Threat CommandMISP vs SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceMISP vs CrowdStrike Falcon IntelligenceMISP vs AlienVault OTXOpenCTI vs Recorded Future Intelligence CloudAnomali ThreatStream vs Recorded Future Intelligence CloudRapid7 Threat Command vs Recorded Future Intelligence CloudSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future Intelligence CloudCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence vs Recorded Future Intelligence CloudRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud vs AlienVault OTXAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full threat intel standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.