Eleven of fourteen models named Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response first on the direct prompt; one named Huntress Managed EDR. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Huntress Managed EDR by thirteen and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response carries 48 labels and Huntress Managed EDR 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the managed detection and response page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and Huntress Managed EDR were named in the same answer seventy-one times, of the 127 answers naming Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and the 367 naming Huntress Managed EDR. In those answers Huntress Managed EDR took the first choice thirty times and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Arctic Wolf (transparency issues)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Arctic Wolf's Concierge Security Team model is a differentiator, but the trade-off is noted as limited data transparency, guided not hands-on remediation.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Praised for its Concierge model and warranty, but some note it's not ideal for very small teams or if you need extreme customization” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Arctic Wolf is built specifically for the mid-market... Comprehensive, concierge-guided support with predictable flat pricing | Arctic Wolf” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best For: Mid-market companies without a dedicated internal SOC that want a dedicated partner model and broad tool integration.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“The Top All-Around Choice: Arctic Wolf ... frequently cited as the leading option for mid-market companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Huntress is affordable and easy to deploy, but has limited detection depth and manual investigations that increase exposure.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excellent value for smaller mid-market or MSP-partnered setups, but may feel light for more complex B2B environments.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Simpler, more affordable endpoint and Microsoft 365-focused MDR, though less comprehensive for complex environments.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · soft negative
“Huntress is widely regarded as the best MDR (Managed Detection and Response) service for companies with a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.