Eleven of fourteen models named Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response first on the direct prompt; four named Sophos MDR. Both were named by all fourteen models and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response carries 48 labels and Sophos MDR 54, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the managed detection and response page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and Sophos MDR were named in the same answer 105 times, of the 127 answers naming Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and the 162 naming Sophos MDR. In those answers Sophos MDR took the first choice eight times and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response twenty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Arctic Wolf (transparency issues)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Arctic Wolf's Concierge Security Team model is a differentiator, but the trade-off is noted as limited data transparency, guided not hands-on remediation.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Praised for its Concierge model and warranty, but some note it's not ideal for very small teams or if you need extreme customization” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Arctic Wolf is built specifically for the mid-market... Comprehensive, concierge-guided support with predictable flat pricing | Arctic Wolf” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best For: Mid-market companies without a dedicated internal SOC that want a dedicated partner model and broad tool integration.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“The Top All-Around Choice: Arctic Wolf ... frequently cited as the leading option for mid-market companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“multiple sources note it can be expensive for smaller organizations, so it's usually better if you can stretch the budget a bit” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Expensive, especially for smaller organizations... Communication issues — slow response times and overwhelming alert volumes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sophos MDR has solid endpoint protection but multi-console workflows and manual triage slow response.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd put Expel and Sophos MDR on the shortlist—not declare one universal winner.” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Sophos MDR or CrowdStrike Falcon Complete” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.