Index › IT › Security operations › DRP › ZeroFox vs UpGuard BreachSight
Digital risk protection · November 2026 Edition

ZeroFox vs UpGuard BreachSight

Two of fourteen models named ZeroFox first on the direct prompt; two named UpGuard BreachSight. ZeroFox was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and UpGuard BreachSight by nine and ZeroFox carries 60 labels and UpGuard BreachSight 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ZeroFox

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

UpGuard BreachSight

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share18%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate30%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels6014A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ZeroFox reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs ZeroFox · SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs UpGuard BreachSight · ZeroFox vs Flare

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital risk protection page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ZeroFoxFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUpGuard BreachSight
Direct222 against ZeroFox · 1 against UpGuard BreachSight
Paraphrase511 against ZeroFox
Comparative60
Budget-constrained106 against ZeroFox
Scale-constrained00
Negative009 against ZeroFox · 2 against UpGuard BreachSight
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ZeroFox and UpGuard BreachSight were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 179 answers naming ZeroFox and the 105 naming UpGuard BreachSight. In those answers UpGuard BreachSight took the first choice eight times and ZeroFox six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ZeroFox and UpGuard BreachSight stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
ZeroFox UpGuard BreachSight first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ZeroFox on the left and UpGuard BreachSight on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ZeroFox and UpGuard BreachSight stood in it.

ZeroFox first, UpGuard BreachSight an alternative

2 of 14 modelsUpGuard BreachSight was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallZeroFox alternatives: Cyberint, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
GLM 4.7 FlashXZeroFox alternatives: Doppel, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSight

UpGuard BreachSight first, ZeroFox an alternative

2 of 14 modelsZeroFox was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: BlueVoyant Sky: DRP, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest Digital Shadows, ZeroFox
Qwen 3.7 FlashUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: Cyble Vision

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cyble Vision alternatives: BlueVoyant Sky: DRP, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSight
Gemini 3.5 FlashFlare alternatives: Bolster, Rapid7 Threat Command, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFox
DeepSeek V4 FlashSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: ZeroFox
Kimi K2CTM360, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Fortra Brand Protection, ZeroFox
MiniMax M2.5SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFox

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Doppel, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Grok 4.20SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Cyble Vision
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GPT-6 LunaSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Bolster, Fortra Brand Protection
Muse Glimmer 30BSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CloudSEK XVigil, Cyberint

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
ZeroFox4%#5 of 10
UpGuard BreachSight4%#4 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
ZeroFox leads by eleven points.
ZeroFox18%#2 of 13
UpGuard BreachSight7%#4 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
ZeroFox leads by thirty-three points.
ZeroFox37%#1 of 11
UpGuard BreachSight4%#5 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ZeroFox

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid: Enterprise-only DRP tools (like ZeroFox or Recorded Future) unless you have a dedicated security budget of $100,000+ per year.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Tight Budgets: Enterprise-heavy options like Recorded Future, ZeroFox, or Rapid7 often start at $20,000–$50,000+/year” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“ZeroFox - mentioned as having a high negative rate and being criticized for its focus on visibility rather than disruption.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Strong for brand and executive threat coverage across social media and external platforms, suitable for SMB through enterprise with modular options.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“ZeroFox is widely recognized for its deep coverage across social media, mobile app stores, and digital channels.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose ZeroFox if impersonation, executive threats, social media, or brand abuse are priorities.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about UpGuard BreachSight

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“independent comparisons flag questions around coverage, operational fit, and whether findings translate into effective remediation; validate it carefully” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Platforms to be cautious about: BitSight, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“UpGuard BreachSight is frequently identified as the top digital risk protection (DRP) solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, UpGuard Breach Risk is the strongest default choice” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest default recommendation is UpGuard Breach Risk” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.