Digital risk protection · November 2026 Edition
ZeroFox vs Cyble Vision
Two of fourteen models named ZeroFox first on the direct prompt; one named Cyble Vision. ZeroFox was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cyble Vision by nine and ZeroFox carries 60 labels and Cyble Vision 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share18%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate30%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels6015A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ZeroFox reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs ZeroFox · SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Cyble Vision · ZeroFox vs Flare
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital risk protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ZeroFoxFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCyble Vision
Direct212 against ZeroFox
Paraphrase501 against ZeroFox
Comparative60
Budget-constrained116 against ZeroFox
Scale-constrained00
Negative009 against ZeroFox
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ZeroFox and Cyble Vision were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 179 answers naming ZeroFox and the 92 naming Cyble Vision. In those answers Cyble Vision took the first choice two times and ZeroFox eight.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ZeroFox and Cyble Vision stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
ZeroFox Cyble Vision first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ZeroFox on the left and Cyble Vision on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ZeroFox and Cyble Vision stood in it.
ZeroFox first, Cyble Vision not the choice
2 of 14 modelsCyble Vision was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallZeroFox alternatives: Cyberint, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
GLM 4.7 FlashXZeroFox alternatives: Doppel, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSight
Cyble Vision first, ZeroFox not the choice
1 of 14 modelsZeroFox was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Cyble Vision alternatives: BlueVoyant Sky: DRP, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSight
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashFlare alternatives: Bolster, Rapid7 Threat Command, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFox
Perplexity SonarUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: BlueVoyant Sky: DRP, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest Digital Shadows, ZeroFox
Grok 4.20SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Cyble Vision
DeepSeek V4 FlashSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: ZeroFox
Qwen 3.7 FlashUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: Cyble Vision
Kimi K2CTM360, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Fortra Brand Protection, ZeroFox
MiniMax M2.5SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFox
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Doppel, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GPT-6 LunaSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Bolster, Fortra Brand Protection
Muse Glimmer 30BSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CloudSEK XVigil, Cyberint
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ZeroFox leads by four points.
ZeroFox4%#5 of 10Cyble Vision0%#9 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
ZeroFox leads by fourteen points.
ZeroFox18%#2 of 13Cyble Vision5%#5 of 13Enterprise
ZeroFox leads by thirty-one points.
ZeroFox37%#1 of 11Cyble Vision6%#3 of 11What the models said about ZeroFox
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid: Enterprise-only DRP tools (like ZeroFox or Recorded Future) unless you have a dedicated security budget of $100,000+ per year.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Tight Budgets: Enterprise-heavy options like Recorded Future, ZeroFox, or Rapid7 often start at $20,000–$50,000+/year” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“ZeroFox - mentioned as having a high negative rate and being criticized for its focus on visibility rather than disruption.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Strong for brand and executive threat coverage across social media and external platforms, suitable for SMB through enterprise with modular options.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“ZeroFox is widely recognized for its deep coverage across social media, mobile app stores, and digital channels.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose ZeroFox if impersonation, executive threats, social media, or brand abuse are priorities.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cyble Vision
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“best for mid-market organizations that want broad DRP coverage with AI-assisted triage without an enterprise-tier price point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Cyble Vision offers breadth of coverage at a generally more accessible price point and appeals to mid-market buyers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs ZeroFoxSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Cyble VisionZeroFox vs FlareZeroFox vs UpGuard BreachSightZeroFox vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFlare vs Cyble VisionUpGuard BreachSight vs Cyble VisionCyble Vision vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full DRP standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.