Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › Deception › Canarytokens vs OpenCanary
Deception technology · November 2026 Edition

Canarytokens vs OpenCanary

Zero of fourteen models named Canarytokens first on the direct prompt; zero named OpenCanary. Canarytokens was named by eight of the fourteen models and OpenCanary by thirteen and Canarytokens carries 11 labels and OpenCanary 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Canarytokens

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

OpenCanary

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1122A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Canarytokens reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Thinkst Canary was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Thinkst Canary vs Canarytokens · Thinkst Canary vs OpenCanary · Canarytokens vs HoneyWire

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the deception technology page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CanarytokensFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOpenCanary
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained32
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Canarytokens and OpenCanary were named in the same answer twenty-four times, of the 34 answers naming Canarytokens and the 65 naming OpenCanary. In those answers OpenCanary took the first choice two times and Canarytokens five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Canarytokens and OpenCanary stood in it.
ModelDirectOPParaphraseOPComparativeOPBudget-constrainedOPScale-constrainedOPNegativeOP
Claude Haiku 4.5OP
GPT-5.4 miniOP
Gemini 3.5 FlashOPOP
Perplexity SonarOP
Grok 4.20OPOP
Mistral SmallOP
DeepSeek V4 FlashOP
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashOPOP
Kimi K2OPOP
GLM 4.7 FlashXOP
MiniMax M2.5OP
GPT-6 LunaOPOP
Muse Glimmer 30BOPOP
CanarytokensOP OpenCanary first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Canarytokens on the left and OpenCanary on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Canarytokens and OpenCanary stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Thinkst Canary alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Canarytokens, Illusive Networks

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLabyrinth Deception Platform alternatives: Cynet, Tracebit
Gemini 3.5 FlashThinkst Canary alternatives: Fortinet FortiDeceptor, SentinelOne Singularity Remote Deception / Identity, Tracebit, Zscaler Deception
Perplexity SonarThinkst Canary alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Fidelis Deception, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception
Grok 4.20Thinkst Canary alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, FortiDeceptor, Illusive Networks, TrapX
Mistral SmallThinkst Canary alternatives: CyberTrap, Zscaler Deception
DeepSeek V4 FlashAcalvio ShadowPlex alternatives: SentinelOne Singularity, Thinkst Canary
Llama 4 MaverickThinkst Canary alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Cymulate Deception, Fidelis Deception, Illusive Networks, TrapX DeceptionGrid
Qwen 3.7 FlashCymulate alternatives: Attivo Networks, Crypt48
Kimi K2Cynet, Tracebit alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Deceptive Bytes
GLM 4.7 FlashXThinkst Canary alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex
MiniMax M2.5CounterCraft, Fidelis Deception alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Attivo Networks
GPT-6 LunaThinkst Canary alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception
Muse Glimmer 30BThinkst Canary alternatives: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Attivo Networks ThreatDefend Deception and Response Platform

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
OpenCanary leads by four points.
OpenCanary13%#2 of 15
Canarytokens9%#3 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Canarytokens leads at mid-market.
Canarytokens6%#2 of 16
OpenCanary4%#3 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Canarytokens0%#– of 13
OpenCanary0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Canarytokens

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Step 1 (Today - $0): Go to [Canarytokens.org]... This gives you immediate detection capabilities with zero cost.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Canarytokens.org — deploy free tokens across your critical assets immediately” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Immediate: Deploy Canarytokens.org (free) across your critical assets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about OpenCanary

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“start with canary tokens and one OpenCanary host, because they cost almost nothing and produce alerts you can trust.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“For a very limited budget, start with OpenCanary.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“OpenCanary is the leading open-source network honeypot platform for teams that want low-overhead network-level deception” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Thinkst Canary vs CanarytokensThinkst Canary vs OpenCanaryCanarytokens vs HoneyWireCanarytokens vs Acalvio ShadowPlexCanarytokens vs TracebitCanarytokens vs CounterCraftCanarytokens vs Fidelis DeceptionOpenCanary vs HoneyWireOpenCanary vs Acalvio ShadowPlexOpenCanary vs TracebitOpenCanary vs CounterCraftOpenCanary vs Fidelis DeceptionAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full deception standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.