Index › IT › Security operations › Comms archiving › Smarsh Enterprise Archive vs Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Communications archiving and compliance · November 2026 Edition
Smarsh Enterprise Archive vs Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Six of fourteen models named Smarsh Enterprise Archive first on the direct prompt; one named Proofpoint Enterprise Archive. Both were named by all fourteen models and Smarsh Enterprise Archive carries 53 labels and Proofpoint Enterprise Archive 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share18%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5329A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Smarsh Enterprise Archive reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Mimecast Cloud Archive was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Smarsh Enterprise Archive vs Microsoft Purview · Smarsh Enterprise Archive vs MailStore Server · Smarsh Enterprise Archive vs Mimecast Cloud Archive
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the communications archiving and compliance page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Smarsh Enterprise ArchiveFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProofpoint Enterprise Archive
Direct61
Paraphrase401 against Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Comparative111
Budget-constrained001 against Smarsh Enterprise Archive · 1 against Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Scale-constrained001 against Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Negative018 against Smarsh Enterprise Archive · 3 against Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Smarsh Enterprise Archive and Proofpoint Enterprise Archive were named in the same answer ninety-three times, of the 160 answers naming Smarsh Enterprise Archive and the 105 naming Proofpoint Enterprise Archive. In those answers Proofpoint Enterprise Archive took the first choice six times and Smarsh Enterprise Archive thirty-five.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Smarsh Enterprise Archive and Proofpoint Enterprise Archive stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Smarsh Enterprise Archive Proofpoint Enterprise Archive first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Smarsh Enterprise Archive on the left and Proofpoint Enterprise Archive on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Smarsh Enterprise Archive and Proofpoint Enterprise Archive stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.GPT-5.4 miniProofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive alternatives: Archive360, Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Nuclei Discovery & Archive Suite
Smarsh Enterprise Archive first, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive not the choice
5 of 14 modelsProofpoint Enterprise Archive was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Smarsh Enterprise Archive alternatives: ComplyKEY MailMeter, Jatheon Enterprise Data Archiving Solution, MailStore Server, Mimecast Cloud Archive
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmarsh Enterprise Archive alternatives: Global Relay Archive, Jatheon, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Theta Lake
Mistral SmallSmarsh Enterprise Archive alternatives: MessageWatcher, OpenText Core Business Communication Archive, Theta Lake
GLM 4.7 FlashXSmarsh Enterprise Archive alternatives: MailStore Server, Microsoft Purview, Mimecast Cloud Archive, OpenText Core Business Communication Archive
Muse Glimmer 30BSmarsh Enterprise Archive alternatives: Global Relay Archive, Jatheon, Mimecast Cloud Archive
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarOpenText Core Business Communication Archive alternatives: Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Jatheon, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, SteelEye
Grok 4.20Mimecast Cloud Archive alternatives: Pagefreezer, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Theta Lake
DeepSeek V4 FlashMimecast Cloud Archive alternatives: Global Relay Archive, Google Vault, MailStore Server, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Purview alternatives: Mimecast Cloud Archive, Nuclei, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Purview alternatives: Google Vault, Intradyn, MessageWatcher, Mimecast Cloud Archive, OpenText™ Core Business Communication Archive
Kimi K2Smarsh Professional Archive alternatives: Barracuda Message Archiver, Jatheon, Mimecast Cloud Archive
MiniMax M2.5Smarsh Professional Archive alternatives: Barracuda Message Archiver, Global Relay Archive, Microsoft Purview, Mimecast Cloud Archive
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Smarsh Enterprise Archive leads by five points.
Smarsh Enterprise Archive5%#4 of 12Proofpoint Enterprise Archive0%#11 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Smarsh Enterprise Archive leads by sixteen points.
Smarsh Enterprise Archive18%#1 of 13Proofpoint Enterprise Archive2%#8 of 13Enterprise
Smarsh Enterprise Archive leads by twenty-four points.
Smarsh Enterprise Archive42%#1 of 10Proofpoint Enterprise Archive18%#2 of 10What the models said about Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Smarsh Enterprise Archive and Proofpoint Enterprise Archive are considered "criticized challengers" due to their complex pricing, unavailability of functions, slow search” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid or be truly cautious about: Global Relay (if you're not a large enterprise), Veritas Enterprise Vault (if you're not already locked in), and Smarsh” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“heavily criticized for complex and vague pricing, slow search performance... Many models and user reviews consider these issues as deal breakers.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Best overall for large-scale communications archiving, for organizations needing capture across 100-plus channels with mature surveillance and discovery workflows.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Exceptional breadth of channel capture... Financial institutions facing SEC/FINRA scrutiny generally lean toward Global Relay, Smarsh, or Shield” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Smarsh is well-suited for regulated enterprises and growing mid-market firms that need supervision across multiple communication channels” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“considered "criticized challengers" due to their complex pricing, unavailability of functions, slow search, and lack of robust technical support” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“What I'd avoid on a tight budget: enterprise-first platforms like Smarsh Professional Archive or Proofpoint Enterprise Archive” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“Proofpoint has a high negative rate (53%), with criticisms focusing on functionality and support issues” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“the best default choice is usually Proofpoint’s midmarket archiving / Discovery & Archive offering” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Safer Bets ... Proofpoint Enterprise Archive – accepted challenger, higher satisfaction scores” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Need the broadest regulated communications coverage? Smarsh or Proofpoint.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Smarsh Enterprise Archive vs Microsoft PurviewSmarsh Enterprise Archive vs MailStore ServerSmarsh Enterprise Archive vs Mimecast Cloud ArchiveSmarsh Enterprise Archive vs JatheonSmarsh Enterprise Archive vs Google VaultSmarsh Enterprise Archive vs OpenText Core Business Communication ArchiveMicrosoft Purview vs Proofpoint Enterprise ArchiveMailStore Server vs Proofpoint Enterprise ArchiveMimecast Cloud Archive vs Proofpoint Enterprise ArchiveJatheon vs Proofpoint Enterprise ArchiveGoogle Vault vs Proofpoint Enterprise ArchiveOpenText Core Business Communication Archive vs Proofpoint Enterprise ArchiveAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full comms archiving standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.