Index › IT › Security operations › AI SOC agents › UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs CrowdStrike Charlotte AI
AI SOC agents · November 2026 Edition
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs CrowdStrike Charlotte AI
Three of fourteen models named UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC first on the direct prompt; one named CrowdStrike Charlotte AI. UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC was named by ten of the fourteen models and CrowdStrike Charlotte AI by fourteen and UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC carries 21 labels and CrowdStrike Charlotte AI 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share17%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2128A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Dropzone AI was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Dropzone AI vs UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC · Dropzone AI vs CrowdStrike Charlotte AI · UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs Prophet Security
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SOC agents page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOCFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCrowdStrike Charlotte AI
Direct31
Paraphrase002 against CrowdStrike Charlotte AI
Comparative10
Budget-constrained502 against CrowdStrike Charlotte AI
Scale-constrained10
Negative001 against CrowdStrike Charlotte AI
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC and CrowdStrike Charlotte AI were named in the same answer thirty times, of the 70 answers naming UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC and the 90 naming CrowdStrike Charlotte AI. In those answers CrowdStrike Charlotte AI took the first choice two times and UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC ten.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC and CrowdStrike Charlotte AI stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC CrowdStrike Charlotte AI first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC on the left and CrowdStrike Charlotte AI on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC and CrowdStrike Charlotte AI stood in it.
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC first, CrowdStrike Charlotte AI an alternative
3 of 14 modelsCrowdStrike Charlotte AI was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Dropzone AI
MiniMax M2.5UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Dropzone AI, Radiant Security, eSentire
Muse Glimmer 30BUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Conifers CognitiveSOC, CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, Intezer AI SOC, Microsoft Security Copilot, eSentire
CrowdStrike Charlotte AI first, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC not the choice
1 of 14 modelsUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniCrowdStrike Charlotte AI alternatives: Google Security Operations' agentic SOC, Microsoft Security Copilot
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashDropzone AI, Prophet Security alternatives: CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, Intezer AI SOC, Microsoft Security Copilot, SentinelOne Purple AI, Torq AI SOC Platform
Grok 4.20Dropzone AI alternatives: Microsoft Security Copilot + Sentinel, Torq AI SOC Platform, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC
Qwen 3.7 FlashDropzone AI alternatives: CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, Microsoft Security Copilot, Torq AI SOC Platform, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Radiant Security, UnderDefense MAXI alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Dropzone AI
Perplexity SonarArctic Wolf Aurora Agentic SOC alternatives: Dropzone AI, Intezer AI SOC, Microsoft Security Copilot, Radiant Security, Torq AI SOC Platform
Mistral SmallDropzone AI alternatives: Microsoft Security Copilot, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Torq AI SOC Platform
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Dropzone AI alternatives: Huntress Managed EDR, Radiant Security, UnderDefense MAXI
GLM 4.7 FlashXConifers CognitiveSOC alternatives: Dropzone AI, Microsoft Security Copilot
GPT-6 LunaDropzone AI alternatives: Google Security Operations, Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC leads by sixteen points.
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC16%#3 of 12CrowdStrike Charlotte AI0%#11 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC leads by fifteen points.
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC17%#2 of 10CrowdStrike Charlotte AI2%#5 of 10Enterprise
The order flips: CrowdStrike Charlotte AI leads at enterprise.
CrowdStrike Charlotte AI8%#2 of 13UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC6%#6 of 13What the models said about UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Best Overall Value (Managed & Predictable Pricing) UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC ... frequently cited as the top choice for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the most cost-predictable commercial agentic option in the current evaluations is UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC or Huntress” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“The best AI SOC agent for a company with a limited budget is UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about CrowdStrike Charlotte AI
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid or deprioritize high-end ones like ... CrowdStrike Charlotte AI” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“products like CrowdStrike Charlotte AI were showing 0% first-choice share in that edition with limited labels” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“generally less specialized/autonomous than the pure-play startups above for a standalone mid-sized setup” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd lean CrowdStrike Charlotte AI if you already use CrowdStrike for endpoint/identity/cloud security” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“If your endpoint protection is dominated by Falcon, Charlotte AI provides deep visibility and automated response capabilities” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
“| 4 | CrowdStrike Charlotte AI | 0% but strong presence | Trained on elite analyst judgment, ecosystem-native |” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Dropzone AI vs UnderDefense Agentic AI SOCDropzone AI vs CrowdStrike Charlotte AIUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs Prophet SecurityUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs Huntress Managed EDRUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs Microsoft Security CopilotUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs Radiant SecurityProphet Security vs CrowdStrike Charlotte AIHuntress Managed EDR vs CrowdStrike Charlotte AICrowdStrike Charlotte AI vs Microsoft Security CopilotCrowdStrike Charlotte AI vs Radiant SecurityAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full AI SOC agents standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.