Index › IT › Security operations › AI SOC agents › UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs Prophet Security
AI SOC agents · November 2026 Edition

UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs Prophet Security

Three of fourteen models named UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC first on the direct prompt; one named Prophet Security. UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC was named by ten of the fourteen models and Prophet Security by twelve and UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC carries 21 labels and Prophet Security 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Prophet Security

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share17%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2123A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Dropzone AI was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Dropzone AI vs UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC · Dropzone AI vs Prophet Security · UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC vs Huntress Managed EDR

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SOC agents page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOCFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProphet Security
Direct31
Paraphrase03
Comparative10
Budget-constrained50
Scale-constrained11
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC and Prophet Security were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 70 answers naming UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC and the 69 naming Prophet Security. In those answers Prophet Security took the first choice one time and UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC and Prophet Security stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC Prophet Security first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC on the left and Prophet Security on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC and Prophet Security stood in it.

UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC first, Prophet Security not the choice

3 of 14 modelsProphet Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Dropzone AI
MiniMax M2.5UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Dropzone AI, Radiant Security, eSentire
Muse Glimmer 30BUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Conifers CognitiveSOC, CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, Intezer AI SOC, Microsoft Security Copilot, eSentire

Prophet Security first, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC not the choice

1 of 14 modelsUnderDefense Agentic AI SOC was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashDropzone AI, Prophet Security alternatives: CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, Intezer AI SOC, Microsoft Security Copilot, SentinelOne Purple AI, Torq AI SOC Platform

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20Dropzone AI alternatives: Microsoft Security Copilot + Sentinel, Torq AI SOC Platform, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC
Qwen 3.7 FlashDropzone AI alternatives: CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, Microsoft Security Copilot, Torq AI SOC Platform, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Radiant Security, UnderDefense MAXI alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Dropzone AI
GPT-5.4 miniCrowdStrike Charlotte AI alternatives: Google Security Operations' agentic SOC, Microsoft Security Copilot
Perplexity SonarArctic Wolf Aurora Agentic SOC alternatives: Dropzone AI, Intezer AI SOC, Microsoft Security Copilot, Radiant Security, Torq AI SOC Platform
Mistral SmallDropzone AI alternatives: Microsoft Security Copilot, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Torq AI SOC Platform
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Dropzone AI alternatives: Huntress Managed EDR, Radiant Security, UnderDefense MAXI
GLM 4.7 FlashXConifers CognitiveSOC alternatives: Dropzone AI, Microsoft Security Copilot
GPT-6 LunaDropzone AI alternatives: Google Security Operations, Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC leads by sixteen points.
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC16%#3 of 12
Prophet Security0%#8 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC leads by eight points.
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC17%#2 of 10
Prophet Security10%#3 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC6%#6 of 13
Prophet Security6%#4 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Best Overall Value (Managed & Predictable Pricing) UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC ... frequently cited as the top choice for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the most cost-predictable commercial agentic option in the current evaluations is UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC or Huntress” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“The best AI SOC agent for a company with a limited budget is UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Prophet Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Dropzone AI (for quickest ROI) or Prophet Security (for high transparency and optional 24/7 human coverage) are currently top candidates” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Prophet Security or Dropzone AI for a 30-90 day pilot on your noisiest alert sources.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend Prophet Security as the top choice for an AI SOC analyst focused on alert triage.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.