Two of fourteen models named Lansweeper first on the direct prompt; one named ServiceNow IT Asset Management. Both were named by all fourteen models and Lansweeper carries 52 labels and ServiceNow IT Asset Management 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the IT asset management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Lansweeper and ServiceNow IT Asset Management were named in the same answer ninety-three times, of the 149 answers naming Lansweeper and the 150 naming ServiceNow IT Asset Management. In those answers ServiceNow IT Asset Management took the first choice thirty-eight times and Lansweeper four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Extremely low Trustpilot rating (around 1.7/5 from dozens of reviews), with frequent complaints about useless or unresponsive support” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be wary of older, traditional scanners (like older versions of Lansweeper...) that do not integrate with modern cloud environments” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Platforms where on-prem and cloud versions diverge significantly (a complaint seen with Lansweeper) can become maintenance nightmares.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“a balanced choice is ManageEngine AssetExplorer (cost-effective, solid core features), Lansweeper (fast discovery, broad visibility), or InvGate Asset Management” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“If you mean best value for a typical mid-market B2B company: Lansweeper is often the more practical choice.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“The Top Recommendation: Lansweeper ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Multiple AI-driven reviews recommend avoiding ServiceNow unless you are a large enterprise with dedicated administrators and a substantial budget.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid purchasing top-tier enterprise platforms (e.g., ServiceNow) unless you have dedicated full-time administrative staff” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms such as ServiceNow unless the company needs their extensive ITSM and governance capabilities” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“ServiceNow received the highest rating of 8.6 among the leaders, is the most popular solution in terms of searches by peers, and holds the largest mind share of 11.8%.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“It is widely considered the "Gold Standard" because it unifies Hardware Asset Management (HAM), Software Asset Management (SAM), and Cloud Insights” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Often considered the "Gold Standard" of ITAM... ServiceNow ITAM leads for enterprise integration” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.